Hide metadata

dc.contributor.authorIrgens, Pernille
dc.contributor.authorMyhrvold, Birgitte L.
dc.contributor.authorKongsted, Alice
dc.contributor.authorNatvig, Bård
dc.contributor.authorVøllestad, Nina K.
dc.contributor.authorRobinson, Hilde S.
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-13T05:08:12Z
dc.date.available2022-09-13T05:08:12Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationChiropractic & Manual Therapies. 2022 Sep 08;30(1):37
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/96585
dc.description.abstractBackground The dynamic nature of neck pain has so far been identified through longitudinal studies with frequent measures, a method which is time-consuming and impractical. Pictures illustrating different courses of pain may be an alternative solution, usable in both clinical work and research, but it is unknown how well they capture the clinical course. The aim of this study was to explore and describe self-reported visual trajectories in terms of details of patients’ prospectively reported clinical course, their SMS-based pattern classification of neck pain, and patient’s characteristics. Methods Prospective cohort study including 888 neck pain patients from chiropractic practice, responding to weekly SMS-questions about pain intensity for 1 year from 2015 to 2017. Patients were classified into one of three clinical course patterns using definitions based on previously published descriptors. At 1-year follow-up, patients selected a visual trajectory that best represented their retrospective 1-year course of pain: single episode, episodic, mild ongoing, fluctuating and severe ongoing. Results The visual trajectories generally resembled the 1-year clinical course characteristics on group level, but there were large individual variations. Patients selecting Episodic and Mild ongoing visual trajectories were similar on most parameters. The visual trajectories generally resembled more the clinical course of the last quarter. Discussion The visual trajectories reflected the descriptors of the clinical course of pain captured by weekly SMS measures on a group level and formed groups of patients that differed on symptoms and characteristics. However, there were large variations in symptoms and characteristics within, as well as overlap between, each visual trajectory. In particular, patients with mild pain seemed predisposed to recall bias. Although the visual trajectories and SMS-based classifications appear related, visual trajectories likely capture more elements of the pain experience than just the course of pain. Therefore, they cannot be seen as a proxy for SMS-tracking of pain over 1 year.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsThe Author(s); licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.titleExploring visual pain trajectories in neck pain patients, using clinical course, SMS-based patterns, and patient characteristics: a cohort study
dc.typeJournal article
dc.date.updated2022-09-13T05:08:12Z
dc.creator.authorIrgens, Pernille
dc.creator.authorMyhrvold, Birgitte L.
dc.creator.authorKongsted, Alice
dc.creator.authorNatvig, Bård
dc.creator.authorVøllestad, Nina K.
dc.creator.authorRobinson, Hilde S.
dc.identifier.cristin2055655
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12998-022-00443-3
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-99092
dc.type.documentTidsskriftartikkel
dc.type.peerreviewedPeer reviewed
dc.identifier.fulltextFulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/96585/1/12998_2022_Article_443.pdf
dc.type.versionPublishedVersion
cristin.articleid37


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata

Attribution 4.0 International
This item's license is: Attribution 4.0 International