Hide metadata

dc.contributor.authorVenizelos, Andreas
dc.contributor.authorEngebrethsen, Christina
dc.contributor.authorDeng, Wei
dc.contributor.authorGeisler, Jürgen
dc.contributor.authorGeisler, Stephanie
dc.contributor.authorIversen, Gjertrud T.
dc.contributor.authorAas, Turid
dc.contributor.authorAase, Hildegunn S.
dc.contributor.authorSeyedzadeh, Manouchehr
dc.contributor.authorSteinskog, Eli S.
dc.contributor.authorMyklebost, Ola
dc.contributor.authorNakken, Sigve
dc.contributor.authorVodak, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorHovig, Eivind
dc.contributor.authorMeza-Zepeda, Leonardo A.
dc.contributor.authorLønning, Per E.
dc.contributor.authorKnappskog, Stian
dc.contributor.authorEikesdal, Hans P.
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-16T05:03:48Z
dc.date.available2022-08-16T05:03:48Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationGenome Medicine. 2022 Aug 11;14(1):86
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/95004
dc.description.abstractBackground Subclonal evolution during primary breast cancer treatment is largely unexplored. We aimed to assess the dynamic changes in subclonal composition of treatment-naïve breast cancers during neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Methods We performed whole exome sequencing of tumor biopsies collected before, at therapy switch, and after treatment with sequential epirubicin and docetaxel monotherapy in 51 out of 109 patients with primary breast cancer, who were included in a prospectively registered, neoadjuvant single-arm phase II trial. Results There was a profound and differential redistribution of subclones during epirubicin and docetaxel treatment, regardless of therapy response. While truncal mutations and main subclones persisted, smaller subclones frequently appeared or disappeared. Reassessment of raw data, beyond formal mutation calling, indicated that the majority of subclones seemingly appearing during treatment were in fact present in pretreatment breast cancers, below conventional detection limits. Likewise, subclones which seemingly disappeared were still present, below detection limits, in most cases where tumor tissue remained. Tumor mutational burden (TMB) dropped during neoadjuvant therapy, and copy number analysis demonstrated specific genomic regions to be systematically lost or gained for each of the two chemotherapeutics. Conclusions Sequential epirubicin and docetaxel monotherapy caused profound redistribution of smaller subclones in primary breast cancer, while early truncal mutations and major subclones generally persisted through treatment. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00496795 , registered on July 4, 2007.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsThe Author(s); licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.titleClonal evolution in primary breast cancers under sequential epirubicin and docetaxel monotherapy
dc.typeJournal article
dc.date.updated2022-08-16T05:03:49Z
dc.creator.authorVenizelos, Andreas
dc.creator.authorEngebrethsen, Christina
dc.creator.authorDeng, Wei
dc.creator.authorGeisler, Jürgen
dc.creator.authorGeisler, Stephanie
dc.creator.authorIversen, Gjertrud T.
dc.creator.authorAas, Turid
dc.creator.authorAase, Hildegunn S.
dc.creator.authorSeyedzadeh, Manouchehr
dc.creator.authorSteinskog, Eli S.
dc.creator.authorMyklebost, Ola
dc.creator.authorNakken, Sigve
dc.creator.authorVodak, Daniel
dc.creator.authorHovig, Eivind
dc.creator.authorMeza-Zepeda, Leonardo A.
dc.creator.authorLønning, Per E.
dc.creator.authorKnappskog, Stian
dc.creator.authorEikesdal, Hans P.
dc.identifier.cristin2054776
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13073-022-01090-2
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-97529
dc.type.documentTidsskriftartikkel
dc.type.peerreviewedPeer reviewed
dc.identifier.fulltextFulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/95004/1/13073_2022_Article_1090.pdf
dc.type.versionPublishedVersion
cristin.articleid86


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata

Attribution 4.0 International
This item's license is: Attribution 4.0 International