Hide metadata

dc.contributor.authorBanitalebi, Hasan
dc.contributor.authorAaen, Jørn
dc.contributor.authorStorheim, Kjersti
dc.contributor.authorNegård, Anne
dc.contributor.authorMyklebust, Tor Å.
dc.contributor.authorGrotle, Margreth
dc.contributor.authorHellum, Christian
dc.contributor.authorEspeland, Ansgar
dc.contributor.authorAnvar, Masoud
dc.contributor.authorIndrekvam, Kari
dc.contributor.authorWeber, Clemens
dc.contributor.authorBrox, Jens I.
dc.contributor.authorBrisby, Helena
dc.contributor.authorHermansen, Erland
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-26T05:03:20Z
dc.date.available2022-07-26T05:03:20Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationEuropean Radiology Experimental. 2022 Jul 20;6(1):38
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/94630
dc.description.abstractBackground Fatty infiltration of the paraspinal muscles may play a role in pain and disability in lumbar spinal stenosis. We assessed the reliability and association with clinical symptoms of a method for assessing fatty infiltration, a simplified muscle fat index (MFI). Methods Preoperative axial T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of 243 patients aged 66.6 ± 8.5 years (mean ± standard deviation), 119 females (49%), with symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis were assessed. Fatty infiltration was assessed using both the MFI and the Goutallier classification system (GCS). The MFI was calculated as the signal intensity of the psoas muscle divided by that of the multifidus and erector spinae. Observer reliability was assessed in 102 consecutive patients for three independent investigators by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and 95% limits of agreement (LoA) for continuous variables and Gwet’s agreement coefficient (AC1) for categorical variables. Associations with patient-reported pain and disability were assessed using univariate and multivariate regression analyses. Results Interobserver reliability was good for the MFI (ICC 0.79) and fair for the GCS (AC1 0.33). Intraobserver reliability was good or excellent for the MFI (ICC range 0.86–0.91) and moderate to almost perfect for the GCS (AC1 range 0.55–0.92). Mean interobserver differences of MFI measurements ranged from -0.09 to -0.04 (LoA -0.32 to 0.18). Adjusted for potential confounders, none of the disability or pain parameters was significantly associated with MFI or GCS. Conclusion The proposed MFI demonstrated high observer reliability but was not associated with preoperative pain or disability.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsThe Author(s) under exclusive licence to European Society of Radiology; licensee Springer Publishing Ltd.
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.titleA novel MRI index for paraspinal muscle fatty infiltration: reliability and relation to pain and disability in lumbar spinal stenosis: results from a multicentre study
dc.typeJournal article
dc.date.updated2022-07-26T05:03:21Z
dc.creator.authorBanitalebi, Hasan
dc.creator.authorAaen, Jørn
dc.creator.authorStorheim, Kjersti
dc.creator.authorNegård, Anne
dc.creator.authorMyklebust, Tor Å.
dc.creator.authorGrotle, Margreth
dc.creator.authorHellum, Christian
dc.creator.authorEspeland, Ansgar
dc.creator.authorAnvar, Masoud
dc.creator.authorIndrekvam, Kari
dc.creator.authorWeber, Clemens
dc.creator.authorBrox, Jens I.
dc.creator.authorBrisby, Helena
dc.creator.authorHermansen, Erland
dc.identifier.cristin2043624
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s41747-022-00284-y
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-97163
dc.type.documentTidsskriftartikkel
dc.type.peerreviewedPeer reviewed
dc.identifier.fulltextFulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/94630/1/41747_2022_Article_284.pdf
dc.type.versionPublishedVersion
cristin.articleid38


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata

Attribution 4.0 International
This item's license is: Attribution 4.0 International