Skjul metadata

dc.contributor.authorManiscalco, Laura
dc.contributor.authorSchouteden, Martijn
dc.contributor.authorBoon, Jan
dc.contributor.authorVandenbroeck, Sofie
dc.contributor.authorMehlum, Ingrid S.
dc.contributor.authorGodderis, Lode
dc.contributor.authorMatranga, Domenica
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-14T05:02:24Z
dc.date.available2022-06-14T05:02:24Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationBMC Public Health. 2022 Jun 08;22(1):1145
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/94366
dc.description.abstractObjectives The main purpose of this longitudinal study was to elucidate the impact of external job mobility, due to a change of employer, on mental health. Methods A cohort of Belgian employees from the IDEWE occupational medicine registry was followed-up for twenty-seven years, from 1993 to 2019. The use of drugs for neuropsychological diseases was considered as an objective indicator of mental health. The covariates were related to demographic, physical, behavioural characteristics, occupational and work-related risks. Propensity scores were calculated with a Cox regression model with time-varying covariates. The PS matching was used to eliminate the systematic differences in subjects’ characteristics and to balance the covariates’ distribution at every time point. Results The unmatched sample included 11,246 subjects, with 368 (3.3%) that changed their job during the baseline year and 922 (8.2%) workers that left their employer during the follow-up. More than half of the matched sample were males, were aged less than 38 years old, did not smoke, were physically active, and normal weighted, were not exposed to shift-work, noise, job strain or physical load. A strong association between job mobility and neuropsychological treatment was found in the matched analysis (HR = 2.065, 95%CI = 1.397–3.052, P-value < 0.001) and confirmed in the sensitivity analysis (HR of 2.012, 95%CI = 1.359–2.979, P-value < 0.001). Furthermore, it was found a protective role of physical activity and a harmful role of job strain on neuropsychological treatment. Conclusions Our study found that workers with external job mobility have a doubled risk of treatment with neuropsychological medication, compared to workers without job mobility.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsThe Author(s)
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.titleThe long-term effect of job mobility on workers’ mental health: a propensity score analysis
dc.typeJournal article
dc.date.updated2022-06-14T05:02:25Z
dc.creator.authorManiscalco, Laura
dc.creator.authorSchouteden, Martijn
dc.creator.authorBoon, Jan
dc.creator.authorVandenbroeck, Sofie
dc.creator.authorMehlum, Ingrid S.
dc.creator.authorGodderis, Lode
dc.creator.authorMatranga, Domenica
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13558-2
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-96913
dc.type.documentTidsskriftartikkel
dc.type.peerreviewedPeer reviewed
dc.identifier.fulltextFulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/94366/1/12889_2022_Article_13558.pdf
dc.type.versionPublishedVersion
cristin.articleid1145


Tilhørende fil(er)

Finnes i følgende samling

Skjul metadata

Attribution 4.0 International
Dette verket har følgende lisens: Attribution 4.0 International