Hide metadata

dc.contributor.authorKjelle, Elin
dc.contributor.authorAndersen, Eivind R.
dc.contributor.authorKrokeide, Arne M.
dc.contributor.authorSoril, Lesley J. J.
dc.contributor.authorvan Bodegom-Vos, Leti
dc.contributor.authorClement, Fiona M.
dc.contributor.authorHofmann, Bjørn M.
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-26T05:15:26Z
dc.date.available2022-04-26T05:15:26Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationBMC Medical Imaging. 2022 Apr 21;22(1):73
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/93756
dc.description.abstractBackground Inappropriate and wasteful use of health care resources is a common problem, constituting 10–34% of health services spending in the western world. Even though diagnostic imaging is vital for identifying correct diagnoses and administrating the right treatment, low-value imaging—in which the diagnostic test confers little to no clinical benefit—is common and contributes to inappropriate and wasteful use of health care resources. There is a lack of knowledge on the types and extent of low-value imaging. Accordingly, the objective of this study was to identify, characterize, and quantify the extent of low-value diagnostic imaging examinations for adults and children. Methods A scoping review of the published literature was performed. Medline-Ovid, Embase-Ovid, Scopus, and Cochrane Library were searched for studies published from 2010 to September 2020. The search strategy was built from medical subject headings (Mesh) for Diagnostic imaging/Radiology OR Health service misuse/Medical overuse OR Procedures and Techniques Utilization/Facilities and Services Utilization. Articles in English, German, Dutch, Swedish, Danish, or Norwegian were included. Results A total of 39,986 records were identified and, of these, 370 studies were included in the final synthesis. Eighty-four low-value imaging examinations were identified. Imaging of atraumatic pain, routine imaging in minor head injury, trauma, thrombosis, urolithiasis, after thoracic interventions, fracture follow-up and cancer staging/follow-up were the most frequently identified low-value imaging examinations. The proportion of low-value imaging varied between 2 and 100% inappropriate or unnecessary examinations. Conclusions A comprehensive list of identified low-value radiological examinations for both adults and children are presented. Future research should focus on reasons for low-value imaging utilization and interventions to reduce the use of low-value imaging internationally. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO: CRD42020208072.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsThe Author(s)
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.titleCharacterizing and quantifying low-value diagnostic imaging internationally: a scoping review
dc.typeJournal article
dc.date.updated2022-04-26T05:15:26Z
dc.creator.authorKjelle, Elin
dc.creator.authorAndersen, Eivind R.
dc.creator.authorKrokeide, Arne M.
dc.creator.authorSoril, Lesley J. J.
dc.creator.authorvan Bodegom-Vos, Leti
dc.creator.authorClement, Fiona M.
dc.creator.authorHofmann, Bjørn M.
dc.identifier.cristin2028803
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-022-00798-2
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-96315
dc.type.documentTidsskriftartikkel
dc.type.peerreviewedPeer reviewed
dc.identifier.fulltextFulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/93756/1/12880_2022_Article_798.pdf
dc.type.versionPublishedVersion
cristin.articleid73


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata

Attribution 4.0 International
This item's license is: Attribution 4.0 International