Hide metadata

dc.contributor.authorForberger, Sarah
dc.contributor.authorReisch, Lucia
dc.contributor.authorMeshkovska, Biljana
dc.contributor.authorLobczowska, Karolina
dc.contributor.authorScheller, Daniel A.
dc.contributor.authorWendt, Janine
dc.contributor.authorChristianson, Lara
dc.contributor.authorFrense, Jennifer
dc.contributor.authorSteinacker, Jürgen M.
dc.contributor.authorLuszczynska, Aleksandra
dc.contributor.authorZeeb, Hajo
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-29T05:04:09Z
dc.date.available2022-03-29T05:04:09Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationHealth Research Policy and Systems. 2022 Mar 24;20(1):33
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/93011
dc.description.abstractTaxing sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB) is seen as a win–win situation for governments. It is argued that SSB taxes are relatively easy to implement from a practical perspective compared to for example other nutrition policies. However, the implementation of SSB taxation laws does not happen by itself. Therefore, this work examines implementation processes for SSB taxation in terms of (1) pre-implementation context, (2) taxation instruments used and (3) interactions in the implementation process. Ten databases and grey literature were systematically searched for studies reporting on SSB taxation implementation processes up to February 2020. All studies (N = 1248) were screened independently by two reviewers according to predefined criteria. The selection of variables to be extracted was based on the policy cycle heuristic and informed by intervention implementation research. Information on the process of implementing SSB taxation is limited. Only six cases based on three publications were identified, indicating a gap in this research area. SSB taxation implementation was accomplished by hiring a subcontractor for the implementation or using pre-existing tax collection structures. Political and public support within the implementation process seems to be supportive for the city of Berkeley and for Portugal but was not reported for the Pacific Islands. However, the existing data are very limited, and further research on SSB taxation implementation processes is needed to determine whether the aim of the policy and the envisaged outcome are linked in practice. Registration The protocol was registered with the Open Science Framework (OSF) (osf.io/7w84q/)
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsThe Author(s); licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.titleSugar-sweetened beverage tax implementation processes: results of a scoping review
dc.typeJournal article
dc.date.updated2022-03-29T05:04:10Z
dc.creator.authorForberger, Sarah
dc.creator.authorReisch, Lucia
dc.creator.authorMeshkovska, Biljana
dc.creator.authorLobczowska, Karolina
dc.creator.authorScheller, Daniel A.
dc.creator.authorWendt, Janine
dc.creator.authorChristianson, Lara
dc.creator.authorFrense, Jennifer
dc.creator.authorSteinacker, Jürgen M.
dc.creator.authorLuszczynska, Aleksandra
dc.creator.authorZeeb, Hajo
dc.identifier.cristin2016368
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-022-00832-3
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-95586
dc.type.documentTidsskriftartikkel
dc.type.peerreviewedPeer reviewed
dc.identifier.fulltextFulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/93011/1/12961_2022_Article_832.pdf
dc.type.versionPublishedVersion
cristin.articleid33


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata

Attribution 4.0 International
This item's license is: Attribution 4.0 International