Hide metadata

dc.contributor.authorDeutschmann, Ina M.
dc.contributor.authorLima-Mendez, Gipsi
dc.contributor.authorKrabberød, Anders K.
dc.contributor.authorRaes, Jeroen
dc.contributor.authorVallina, Sergio M.
dc.contributor.authorFaust, Karoline
dc.contributor.authorLogares, Ramiro
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-30T06:03:49Z
dc.date.available2021-11-30T06:03:49Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationMicrobiome. 2021 Nov 26;9(1):232
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/89378
dc.description.abstractBackground Ecological interactions among microorganisms are fundamental for ecosystem function, yet they are mostly unknown or poorly understood. High-throughput-omics can indicate microbial interactions through associations across time and space, which can be represented as association networks. Associations could result from either ecological interactions between microorganisms, or from environmental selection, where the association is environmentally driven. Therefore, before downstream analysis and interpretation, we need to distinguish the nature of the association, particularly if it is due to environmental selection or not. Results We present EnDED (environmentally driven edge detection), an implementation of four approaches as well as their combination to predict which links between microorganisms in an association network are environmentally driven. The four approaches are sign pattern, overlap, interaction information, and data processing inequality. We tested EnDED on networks from simulated data of 50 microorganisms. The networks contained on average 50 nodes and 1087 edges, of which 60 were true interactions but 1026 false associations (i.e., environmentally driven or due to chance). Applying each method individually, we detected a moderate to high number of environmentally driven edges—87% sign pattern and overlap, 67% interaction information, and 44% data processing inequality. Combining these methods in an intersection approach resulted in retaining more interactions, both true and false (32% of environmentally driven associations). After validation with the simulated datasets, we applied EnDED on a marine microbial network inferred from 10 years of monthly observations of microbial-plankton abundance. The intersection combination predicted that 8.3% of the associations were environmentally driven, while individual methods predicted 24.8% (data processing inequality), 25.7% (interaction information), and up to 84.6% (sign pattern as well as overlap). The fraction of environmentally driven edges among negative microbial associations in the real network increased rapidly with the number of environmental factors. Conclusions To reach accurate hypotheses about ecological interactions, it is important to determine, quantify, and remove environmentally driven associations in marine microbial association networks. For that, EnDED offers up to four individual methods as well as their combination. However, especially for the intersection combination, we suggest using EnDED with other strategies to reduce the number of false associations and consequently the number of potential interaction hypotheses. Video abstract
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsThe Author(s); licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.titleDisentangling environmental effects in microbial association networks
dc.typeJournal article
dc.date.updated2021-11-30T06:03:50Z
dc.creator.authorDeutschmann, Ina M.
dc.creator.authorLima-Mendez, Gipsi
dc.creator.authorKrabberød, Anders K.
dc.creator.authorRaes, Jeroen
dc.creator.authorVallina, Sergio M.
dc.creator.authorFaust, Karoline
dc.creator.authorLogares, Ramiro
dc.identifier.cristin1980793
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-021-01141-7
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-91983
dc.type.documentTidsskriftartikkel
dc.type.peerreviewedPeer reviewed
dc.identifier.fulltextFulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/89378/1/40168_2021_Article_1141.pdf
dc.identifier.fulltextFulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/89378/4/Correction-40168_2021_Article_1209.pdf
dc.type.versionPublishedVersion
cristin.articleid232
dc.relation.projectNFR/240904
dc.relation.projectEC/H2020/675752


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata

Attribution 4.0 International
This item's license is: Attribution 4.0 International