Skjul metadata

dc.contributor.authorGarratt, A. M.
dc.contributor.authorFurunes, H.
dc.contributor.authorHellum, C.
dc.contributor.authorSolberg, T.
dc.contributor.authorBrox, J. I.
dc.contributor.authorStorheim, K.
dc.contributor.authorJohnsen, L. G.
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-01T05:02:15Z
dc.date.available2021-06-01T05:02:15Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationHealth and Quality of Life Outcomes. 2021 May 28;19(1):155
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/86271
dc.description.abstractBackground The EuroQol EQ-5D is one of the most widely researched and applied patient-reported outcome measures worldwide. The original EQ-5D-3L and more recent EQ-5D-5L include three and five response categories respectively. Evidence from healthy and sick populations shows that the additional two response categories improve measurement properties but there has not been a concurrent comparison of the two versions in patients with low back pain (LBP). Methods LBP patients taking part in a multicenter randomized controlled trial of lumbar total disc replacement and conservative treatment completed the EQ-5D-3L and 5L in an eight-year follow-up questionnaire. The 3L and 5L were assessed for aspects of data quality including missing data, floor and ceiling effects, response consistency, and based on a priori hypotheses, associations with the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Pain-Visual Analogue Scales and Hopkins Symptom Checklist (HSCL-25). Results At the eight-year follow-up, 151 (87%) patients were available and 146 completed both the 3L and 5L. Levels of missing data were the same for the two versions. Compared to the EQ-5D-5L, the 3L had significantly higher floor (pain discomfort) and ceiling effects (mobility, self-care, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression). For these patients the EQ-5D-5L described 73 health states compared to 28 for the 3L. Shannon’s indices showed the 5L outperformed the 3L in tests of classification efficiency. Correlations with the ODI, Pain-VAS and HSCL-25 were largely as hypothesized, the 5L having slightly higher correlations than the 3L. Conclusion The EQ-5D assesses important aspect of health in LBP patients and the 5L improves upon the 3L in this respect. The EQ-5D-5L is recommended in preference to the 3L version, however, further testing in other back pain populations together with additional measurement properties, including responsiveness to change, is recommended. Trial registration: retrospectively registered: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01704677 .
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsThe Author(s); licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.titleEvaluation of the EQ-5D-3L and 5L versions in low back pain patients
dc.typeJournal article
dc.date.updated2021-06-01T05:02:17Z
dc.creator.authorGarratt, A. M.
dc.creator.authorFurunes, H.
dc.creator.authorHellum, C.
dc.creator.authorSolberg, T.
dc.creator.authorBrox, J. I.
dc.creator.authorStorheim, K.
dc.creator.authorJohnsen, L. G.
dc.identifier.cristin1915915
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-021-01792-y
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-88921
dc.type.documentTidsskriftartikkel
dc.type.peerreviewedPeer reviewed
dc.identifier.fulltextFulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/86271/1/12955_2021_Article_1792.pdf
dc.type.versionPublishedVersion
cristin.articleid155
dc.relation.projectNFR/262673


Tilhørende fil(er)

Finnes i følgende samling

Skjul metadata

Attribution 4.0 International
Dette verket har følgende lisens: Attribution 4.0 International