Hide metadata

dc.contributor.authorVarsi, Cecilie
dc.contributor.authorStenehjem, Aud-Eldrid
dc.contributor.authorBørøsund, Elin
dc.contributor.authorSolberg Nes, Lise
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-23T06:02:20Z
dc.date.available2021-03-23T06:02:20Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationBMC Nephrology. 2021 Mar 22;22(1):105
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/84581
dc.description.abstractBackground Renal transplant recipients have to see a nephrologist for regular follow-up for the rest of their lives. To reduce the burden for the patients, video consultation can be an alternative to traditional in-person hospital consultations. The aim of the current study was, from the perspectives of patients and health care providers, to investigate the perceived benefits and challenges of using video consultations in outpatient renal transplant recipient follow-up. Methods Patients (i.e., renal transplant recipients; n = 18) alternated between regular in-person follow-up consultations and video consultations. Patients and health care providers were then invited to participate in semi-structured interviews. The interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis. Results Patients interviewed (n = 15) were median 53 years old (range 37–64) and 53% female. The video consultation solution used in the study turned out to have major technical deficiencies. Despite the technical challenges, however, the majority of the patients reported appreciating being able to alternate between video and in-person hospital consultations. Main benefits reported included not needing to travel to the hospital and thereby saving time, less focus on being chronically ill and potential economic benefits for patients and society. The health care providers (n = 3) also valued the benefits provided by the use of video consultations, but described the reoccurring technical challenges as disruptive. The fact that patients were in a stable phase of their health condition and already had an established, trusting relationship with their nephrologist, acted as facilitators for success. Possible challenges and harms described included concerns related to security, confidentiality and interruptions, as well as the potential need for physical examinations. Conclusions Benefits from using video consultations as an alternative to in-person consultations may outweigh potential technological challenges for patients as well as health care providers. A long-lasting mutually trusting relationship between patient and provider may be an important prerequisite for the experienced benefits of using video consultation. Findings also indicate that starting such care delivery changes in a small-scale, with a few selected patients in a stable phase of their condition, may be an important factor for success.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsThe Author(s)
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.titleVideo as an alternative to in-person consultations in outpatient renal transplant recipient follow-up: a qualitative study
dc.typeJournal article
dc.date.updated2021-03-23T06:02:21Z
dc.creator.authorVarsi, Cecilie
dc.creator.authorStenehjem, Aud-Eldrid
dc.creator.authorBørøsund, Elin
dc.creator.authorSolberg Nes, Lise
dc.identifier.cristin1920716
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-021-02284-3
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-87283
dc.type.documentTidsskriftartikkel
dc.type.peerreviewedPeer reviewed
dc.identifier.fulltextFulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/84581/1/12882_2021_Article_2284.pdf
dc.type.versionPublishedVersion
cristin.articleid105


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata

Attribution 4.0 International
This item's license is: Attribution 4.0 International