Hide metadata

dc.contributor.authorDahl, Fredrik A.
dc.contributor.authorRama, Taraka
dc.contributor.authorHurlen, Petter
dc.contributor.authorBrekke, Pål H.
dc.contributor.authorHusby, Haldor
dc.contributor.authorGundersen, Tore
dc.contributor.authorNytrø, Øystein
dc.contributor.authorØvrelid, Lilja
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-09T06:02:20Z
dc.date.available2021-03-09T06:02:20Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationBMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making. 2021 Mar 04;21(1):84
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/83787
dc.description.abstractBackground With a motivation of quality assurance, machine learning techniques were trained to classify Norwegian radiology reports of paediatric CT examinations according to their description of abnormal findings. Methods 13.506 reports from CT-scans of children, 1000 reports from CT scan of adults and 1000 reports from X-ray examination of adults were classified as positive or negative by a radiologist, according to the presence of abnormal findings. Inter-rater reliability was evaluated by comparison with a clinician’s classifications of 500 reports. Test–retest reliability of the radiologist was performed on the same 500 reports. A convolutional neural network model (CNN), a bidirectional recurrent neural network model (bi-LSTM) and a support vector machine model (SVM) were trained on a random selection of the children’s data set. Models were evaluated on the remaining CT-children reports and the adult data sets. Results Test–retest reliability: Cohen’s Kappa = 0.86 and F1 = 0.919. Inter-rater reliability: Kappa = 0.80 and F1 = 0.885. Model performances on the Children-CT data were as follows. CNN: (AUC = 0.981, F1 = 0.930), bi-LSTM: (AUC = 0.978, F1 = 0.927), SVM: (AUC = 0.975, F1 = 0.912). On the adult data sets, the models had AUC around 0.95 and F1 around 0.91. Conclusions The models performed close to perfectly on its defined domain, and also performed convincingly on reports pertaining to a different patient group and a different modality. The models were deemed suitable for classifying radiology reports for future quality assurance purposes, where the fraction of the examinations with abnormal findings for different sub-groups of patients is a parameter of interest.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsThe Author(s)
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.titleNeural classification of Norwegian radiology reports: using NLP to detect findings in CT-scans of children
dc.typeJournal article
dc.date.updated2021-03-09T06:02:21Z
dc.creator.authorDahl, Fredrik A.
dc.creator.authorRama, Taraka
dc.creator.authorHurlen, Petter
dc.creator.authorBrekke, Pål H.
dc.creator.authorHusby, Haldor
dc.creator.authorGundersen, Tore
dc.creator.authorNytrø, Øystein
dc.creator.authorØvrelid, Lilja
dc.identifier.cristin1905329
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-021-01451-8
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-86518
dc.type.documentTidsskriftartikkel
dc.type.peerreviewedPeer reviewed
dc.identifier.fulltextFulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/83787/1/12911_2021_Article_1451.pdf
dc.type.versionPublishedVersion
cristin.articleid84


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata

Attribution 4.0 International
This item's license is: Attribution 4.0 International