Hide metadata

dc.contributor.authorHoel, Ida M
dc.contributor.authorSviland, Lisbet
dc.contributor.authorSyre, Heidi
dc.contributor.authorDyrhol-Riise, Anne M
dc.contributor.authorSkarstein, Ingerid
dc.contributor.authorJebsen, Peter
dc.contributor.authorJørstad, Melissa D
dc.contributor.authorWiker, Harald
dc.contributor.authorMustafa, Tehmina
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-18T06:02:07Z
dc.date.available2020-02-18T06:02:07Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationBMC Infectious Diseases. 2020 Feb 12;20(1):130
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/73156
dc.description.abstractBackground Extrapulmonary tuberculosis (EPTB) poses diagnostic challenges due to the paucibacillary nature of the disease. The immunochemistry-based MPT64 antigen detection test (MPT64 test) has shown promising results for diagnosing EPTB in previous studies performed in low-resource settings, with higher sensitivity than microscopy and culture. The aim of this study was to investigate the performance of the MPT64 test in a routine clinical setting in a high-income low TB prevalence country. Methods Extrapulmonary samples sent for TB diagnostics to microbiology and pathology laboratories at three regional tertiary care hospitals in Norway in a one-year period were included and subjected to the MPT64 test in parallel to the routine TB diagnostic tests. Results Samples from 288 patients were included and categorised as confirmed TB cases (n = 26), clinically diagnosed TB cases (n = 5), non-TB cases (n = 243) and uncategorised (n = 14), using a composite reference standard (CRS). In formalin-fixed biopsies, the sensitivity (95% CI) of the MPT64 test, microscopy, PCR-based tests pooled, and culture was 37% (16–62), 20% (4–48), 37% (16–62) and 50% (23–77), respectively, against the CRS. The MPT64 test showed a good positive predictive value (88%) and an excellent specificity (99, 95% CI 92–100) in formalin-fixed biopsies. In fine-needle aspirates, pus and fluid samples, the test performance was lower. Conclusions The MPT64 test was implementable in pathology laboratories as part of routine diagnostics, and although the sensitivity of the MPT64 test was not better than culture in this setting, the test supplements other rapid diagnostic methods, including microscopy and PCR-based tests, and can contribute to strengthen the diagnosis of EPTB in formalin-fixed biopsies in the absence of culture confirmation.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsThe Author(s).
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.titleDiagnosis of extrapulmonary tuberculosis using the MPT64 antigen detection test in a high-income low tuberculosis prevalence setting
dc.typeJournal article
dc.date.updated2020-02-18T06:02:08Z
dc.creator.authorHoel, Ida M
dc.creator.authorSviland, Lisbet
dc.creator.authorSyre, Heidi
dc.creator.authorDyrhol-Riise, Anne M
dc.creator.authorSkarstein, Ingerid
dc.creator.authorJebsen, Peter
dc.creator.authorJørstad, Melissa D
dc.creator.authorWiker, Harald
dc.creator.authorMustafa, Tehmina
dc.identifier.cristin1796379
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-020-4852-z
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-76258
dc.type.documentTidsskriftartikkel
dc.type.peerreviewedPeer reviewed
dc.identifier.fulltextFulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/73156/1/12879_2020_Article_4852.pdf
dc.type.versionPublishedVersion
cristin.articleid130


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata

Attribution 4.0 International
This item's license is: Attribution 4.0 International