Hide metadata

dc.contributor.authorBonsaksen, Tore
dc.contributor.authorHeir, Trond
dc.contributor.authorEkeberg, Øivind
dc.contributor.authorGrimholt, Tine K
dc.contributor.authorLerdal, Anners
dc.contributor.authorSkogstad, Laila
dc.contributor.authorSchou-Bredal, Inger
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-19T06:12:39Z
dc.date.available2019-03-19T06:12:39Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationArchives of Public Health. 2019 Mar 18;77(1):10
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/67305
dc.description.abstractBackground Self-evaluations of mental health problems may be a useful complement to diagnostic assessment, but are less frequently used. This study investigated the prevalence of self-evaluated current and lifetime anxiety in the general Norwegian population, and sociodemographic and psychological factors associated with current anxiety. Methods A cross-sectional population survey was conducted, using anxiety stated by self-evaluation as outcome. Single and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to examine associations between sociodemographic and psychological variables and anxiety. Results One thousand six hundred eighty-four valid responses (34% of the eligible participants) were analysed in this study. One hundred and eleven participants (6.6%) reported current anxiety, while 365 (21.7%) reported lifetime anxiety. Adjusting for sociodemographic and psychological variables, higher age reduced the odds of current anxiety (OR = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.75–0.99), whereas higher levels of neuroticism increased the odds (OR = 2.04, 95% CI = 1.77–2.36). Conclusions The study concludes that higher age appears to protect against anxiety, whereas neuroticism appears to increase the odds of experiencing anxiety.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsThe Author(s); licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.titleSelf-evaluated anxiety in the Norwegian population: prevalence and associated factors
dc.typeJournal article
dc.date.updated2019-03-19T06:12:39Z
dc.creator.authorBonsaksen, Tore
dc.creator.authorHeir, Trond
dc.creator.authorEkeberg, Øivind
dc.creator.authorGrimholt, Tine K
dc.creator.authorLerdal, Anners
dc.creator.authorSkogstad, Laila
dc.creator.authorSchou-Bredal, Inger
dc.identifier.cristin1677918
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-019-0338-0
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-70480
dc.type.documentTidsskriftartikkel
dc.type.peerreviewedPeer reviewed
dc.identifier.fulltextFulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/67305/1/13690_2019_Article_338.pdf
dc.type.versionPublishedVersion
cristin.articleid10


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata

Attribution 4.0 International
This item's license is: Attribution 4.0 International