Hide metadata

dc.contributor.authorDoma, Kenji
dc.contributor.authorSpeyer, Renée
dc.contributor.authorParsons, Lauren A
dc.contributor.authorCordier, Reinie
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-05T09:06:16Z
dc.date.available2019-03-05T09:06:16Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationBMC Medical Research Methodology. 2019 Mar 01;19(1):43
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/67041
dc.description.abstractBackground This systematic review examined the methodological quality of studies and assessed the psychometric qualities of interview-administered Past-week and Usual-week Physical Activity Questionnaires (PAQs). Pubmed and Embase were used to retrieve data sources. Methods The studies were selected using the following eligibility criteria: 1) psychometric properties of PAQs were assessed in adults; 2) the PAQs either consisted of recall periods of usual 7-days (Usual-week PAQs) within the past 12 months or during the past 7-days (Past-week PAQs); and 3) PAQs were interview-administered. The COSMIN taxonomy was utilised to critically appraise study quality and a previously established psychometric criteria employed to evaluate the overall psychometric qualities. Results Following screening, 42 studies were examined to determine the psychometric properties of 20 PAQs, with the majority of studies demonstrating good to excellent ratings for methodological quality. For convergent validity (i.e., the relationship between PAQs and other measures), similar overall associations were found between Past-week PAQs and Usual-week PAQs. However, PAQs were more strongly associated with direct measures of physical activity (e.g., accelerometer) than indirect measures of physical activity (i.e., physical fitness), irrespective of recall methods. Very few psychometric properties were examined for each PAQ, with the majority exhibiting poor ratings in psychometric quality. Only a few interview-administered PAQs exhibited positive ratings for a single psychometric property, although the other properties were either rated as poor or questionable, demonstrating the limitations of current PAQs. Conclusion Accordingly, further research is necessary to explore a greater number of psychometric properties, or to develop new PAQs by addressing the psychometric limitations identified in the current review.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsThe Author(s).
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.titleComparison of psychometric properties between recall methods of interview-based physical activity questionnaires: a systematic review
dc.typeJournal article
dc.date.updated2019-03-05T09:06:17Z
dc.creator.authorDoma, Kenji
dc.creator.authorSpeyer, Renée
dc.creator.authorParsons, Lauren A
dc.creator.authorCordier, Reinie
dc.identifier.cristin1704419
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0684-1
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-70254
dc.type.documentTidsskriftartikkel
dc.type.peerreviewedPeer reviewed
dc.identifier.fulltextFulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/67041/1/12874_2019_Article_684.pdf
dc.type.versionPublishedVersion
cristin.articleid43


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata

Attribution 4.0 International
This item's license is: Attribution 4.0 International