Hide metadata

dc.contributor.authorEngen, Cathrine N
dc.contributor.authorÅrøen, Asbjørn
dc.contributor.authorEngebretsen, Lars
dc.date.accessioned2017-07-04T05:02:21Z
dc.date.available2017-07-04T05:02:21Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2017 Jun 30;18(1):282
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/55802
dc.description.abstractBackground Norway has no prospective surveillance system to monitor the outcome of knee cartilage surgery. In 2004 the Norwegian Registry of Knee Ligament (NKLR) was successfully established, and has yielded useful information on the treatment of patients with both knee ligament and combined knee injuries. Patients with focal cartilage defects (FCDs) in their knees have reduced function and the treatment is difficult. There are geographical variations in treatment, and the generalizability from randomized controlled studies is low. These patients would benefit from a standardized long-time follow-up through a cartilage surgery register. The aim of the present study was to describe the development and report baseline challenges during the setting up of a pilot of a knee cartilage surgery register. Methods The study was designed as a prospective cohort study in the form of a register. Patients with full-thickness FCDs in the knee with International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) grade 3–4 on arthroscopy were included. The pilot included two hospitals; Oslo University Hospital (OUS), Ullevål and Akershus University Hospital (Ahus). Results We registered 58 patients with isolated FCDs, whereas 16 additional patients with full-thickness FCDs were registered through the NKLR. The patient cohort of patients with isolated FCDs consisted of 65% men and had a mean age of 29.8 years. The data are incomplete and the compliance varies from 18 to 73%. The distribution of mean KOOS scores were similar to previous patient cohorts with FCDs, with low scores for the KOOS Sport/Recreation and Quality of Life subscales. Conclusion The level of compliance demonstrated a large difference between the two participating hospitals. The compliance for the isolated FCDs were low in both locations, although it reached an acceptable level in one hospital when patients with combined injuries from the NKLR were included. The forms were incompletely filled out by the surgeons postoperatively and need to be revised prior the establishment of a nation-wide register.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofEngen, Cathrine Nørstad (2017) Knee cartilage surgery: epidemiology, research methods and a proposal for improved surveillance. Doctoral thesis. http://hdl.handle.net/10852/59064
dc.relation.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/59064
dc.rightsThe Author(s).
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.titleDevelopment of a pilot cartilage surgery register
dc.typeJournal article
dc.date.updated2017-07-04T05:02:22Z
dc.creator.authorEngen, Cathrine N
dc.creator.authorÅrøen, Asbjørn
dc.creator.authorEngebretsen, Lars
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-017-1638-6
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-58575
dc.type.documentTidsskriftartikkel
dc.type.peerreviewedPeer reviewed
dc.identifier.fulltextFulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/55802/1/12891_2017_Article_1638.pdf
dc.type.versionPublishedVersion
cristin.articleid282


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata

Attribution 4.0 International
This item's license is: Attribution 4.0 International