Hide metadata

dc.contributor.authorEide, Torunn B
dc.contributor.authorStraand, Jørund
dc.contributor.authorMelbye, Hasse
dc.contributor.authorRortveit, Guri
dc.contributor.authorHetlevik, Irene
dc.contributor.authorRosvold, Elin O
dc.date.accessioned2016-08-30T04:41:42Z
dc.date.available2016-08-30T04:41:42Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationBMC Health Services Research. 2016 Aug 24;16(1):428
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/51859
dc.description.abstractBackground General practitioners (GPs) constitute a vital part of a strong primary health care system. We need further knowledge concerning factors that may affect the patients’ experiences in their meetings with the GPs. We investigated to what degree organizational factors and GP characteristics are associated with patients’ communicative experiences in a consultation. Methods We used data from the Norwegian part of the international, multi-center study Quality and Costs of Primary Care in Europe (QUALICOPC). We included 198 Norwegian GPs and 1529 patients. The patients completed a survey concerning experiences in a consultation with a GP on the inclusion day. The GPs completed a survey regarding organizational aspects of their own practice. Main outcome measures were seven statements concerning how the patients experienced the communication with the GP during the consultation. A generalized estimating equation logistic regression model was used to identify variations in patient experiences associated with characteristics of the GPs and their practices. Results The patients reported overall positive experiences with their GP consultations. Patients who consulted a GP with a short patient list were less likely than patients who consulted a GP with a medium sized list to regard the GP as polite (Odds Ratio (OR) 0.2; 95 % CI 0.1–0.7), to report that the GP asked questions about their health problems (OR 0.6; 0.4–1.0) or that the GP used sufficient time (OR 0.5; CI 0.3–0.9). Patients who consulted a GP with a long patient list compared to patients who consulted a GP with a medium sized list were less likely to feel that they could cope better after the GP visit (OR 0.5; 0.3–0.9) and more likely to feel that the GP hardly looked at them while talking (OR 1.8; 1.0–3.0). No associations with patient experiences were found with the average duration of the consultations, whether the GP worked in a fee-for-service model or whether the GP was the patient’s regular doctor. Conclusions Norwegian patients report predominantly positive experiences when consulting a GP. Positive communication experiences are most likely to be reported when the GP has a medium sized patient list.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsThe Author(s).
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.titlePatient experiences and the association with organizational factors in general practice: results from the Norwegian part of the international, multi-centre, cross-sectional QUALICOPC study
dc.typeJournal article
dc.date.updated2016-08-30T04:41:43Z
dc.creator.authorEide, Torunn B
dc.creator.authorStraand, Jørund
dc.creator.authorMelbye, Hasse
dc.creator.authorRortveit, Guri
dc.creator.authorHetlevik, Irene
dc.creator.authorRosvold, Elin O
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1684-z
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-55198
dc.type.documentTidsskriftartikkel
dc.type.peerreviewedPeer reviewed
dc.identifier.fulltextFulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/51859/1/12913_2016_Article_1684.pdf
dc.type.versionPublishedVersion
cristin.articleid428


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata

Attribution 4.0 International
This item's license is: Attribution 4.0 International