Hide metadata

dc.contributor.authorKristoffersen, Espen S
dc.contributor.authorAaseth, Kjersti
dc.contributor.authorGrande, Ragnhild B
dc.contributor.authorLundqvist, Christofer
dc.contributor.authorRussell, Michael B
dc.date.accessioned2015-11-27T13:03:32Z
dc.date.available2015-11-27T13:03:32Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.citationThe Journal of Headache and Pain. 2013 Apr 18;14(1):36
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/47948
dc.description.abstractBackground Chronic headache is associated with disability and high utilisation of health care including complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). Findings We investigated self-reported efficacy of CAM in people with chronic headache from the general population. Respondents with possible self-reported chronic headache were interviewed by physicians experienced in headache diagnostics. CAM queried included acupuncture, chiropractic, homeopathy, naprapathy, physiotherapy, psychological treatment, and psychomotor physiotherapy. Sixty-two % and 73% of those with primary and secondary chronic headache had used CAM. Self-reported efficacy of CAM ranged from 0-43% without significant differences between gender, headache diagnoses, co-occurrence of migraine, medication use or physician contact. Conclusion CAM is widely used, despite self-reported efficacy of different CAM modalities is modest in the management of chronic headache.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsKristoffersen et al.; licensee Springer.
dc.rightsAttribution 2.0 Generic
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/
dc.titleSelf-reported efficacy of complementary and alternative medicine: the Akershus study of chronic headache
dc.typeJournal article
dc.date.updated2015-11-27T13:03:32Z
dc.creator.authorKristoffersen, Espen S
dc.creator.authorAaseth, Kjersti
dc.creator.authorGrande, Ragnhild B
dc.creator.authorLundqvist, Christofer
dc.creator.authorRussell, Michael B
dc.identifier.jtitleThe Journal of Headache and Pain
dc.identifier.volume14
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1129-2377-14-36
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-51969
dc.type.documentTidsskriftartikkel
dc.type.peerreviewedPeer reviewed
dc.identifier.fulltextFulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/47948/1/10194_2013_Article_282.pdf
dc.type.versionPublishedVersion
cristin.articleid36


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata

Attribution 2.0 Generic
This item's license is: Attribution 2.0 Generic