Hide metadata

dc.contributor.authorChaibi, Aleksander
dc.contributor.authorRussell, Michael B
dc.date.accessioned2015-11-27T13:02:58Z
dc.date.available2015-11-27T13:02:58Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/47925
dc.description.abstractThis paper systematically reviewed randomized clinical trials (RCT) assessing the efficacy of manual therapies for cervicogenic headache (CEH). A total of seven RCTs were identified, i.e. one study applied physiotherapy ± temporomadibular mobilization techniques and six studies applied cervical spinal manipulative therapy (SMT). The RCTs suggest that physiotherapy and SMT might be an effective treatment in the management of CEH, but the results are difficult to evaluate, since only one study included a control group that did not receive treatment. Furthermore, the RCTs mostly included participant with infrequent CEH. Future challenges regarding CEH are substantial both from a diagnostic and management point of view. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsThe Author(s)
dc.titleManual therapies for cervicogenic headache: a systematic review
dc.typeJournal article
dc.date.updated2015-11-27T13:02:58Z
dc.creator.authorChaibi, Aleksander
dc.creator.authorRussell, Michael B
dc.identifier.jtitleThe Journal of Headache and Pain
dc.identifier.volume13
dc.identifier.issue5
dc.identifier.startpage351
dc.identifier.endpage359
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10194-012-0436-7
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-51952
dc.type.documentTidsskriftartikkel
dc.type.peerreviewedPeer reviewed
dc.identifier.fulltextFulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/47925/1/10194_2012_Article_436.pdf
dc.type.versionPublishedVersion


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata