Hide metadata

dc.contributor.authorTikkinen, Kari A
dc.contributor.authorAgarwal, Arnav
dc.contributor.authorCraigie, Samantha
dc.contributor.authorCartwright, Rufus
dc.contributor.authorGould, Michael K
dc.contributor.authorHaukka, Jari
dc.contributor.authorNaspro, Richard
dc.contributor.authorNovara, Giacomo
dc.contributor.authorSandset, Per M
dc.contributor.authorSiemieniuk, Reed A
dc.contributor.authorViolette, Philippe D
dc.contributor.authorGuyatt, Gordon H
dc.date.accessioned2015-10-20T12:46:53Z
dc.date.available2015-10-20T12:46:53Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.citationSystematic Reviews. 2014 Dec 23;3(1):150
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/47351
dc.description.abstractBackground Pharmacological thromboprophylaxis in the peri-operative period involves a trade-off between reduction in venous thromboembolism (VTE) and an increase in bleeding. Baseline risks, in the absence of prophylaxis, for VTE and bleeding are known to vary widely between urological procedures, but their magnitude is highly uncertain. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses addressing baseline risks are uncommon, needed, and require methodological innovation. In this article, we describe the rationale and methods for a series of systematic reviews of the risks of symptomatic VTE and bleeding requiring reoperation in urological surgery. Methods/design We searched MEDLINE from January 1, 2000 until April 10, 2014 for observational studies reporting on symptomatic VTE or bleeding after urological procedures. Additional studies known to experts and studies cited in relevant review articles were added. Teams of two reviewers, independently assessed articles for eligibility, evaluated risk of bias, and abstracted data. We derived best estimates of risk from the median estimates among studies rated at the lowest risk of bias. The primary endpoints were 30-day post-operative risk estimates of symptomatic VTE and bleeding requiring reoperation, stratified by procedure and patient risk factors. Discussion This series of systematic reviews will inform clinicians and patients regarding the trade-off between VTE prevention and bleeding. Our work advances standards in systematic reviews of surgical complications, including assessment of risk of bias, criteria for arriving at best estimates of risk (including modeling of timing of events and dealing with suboptimal data reporting), dealing with subgroups at higher and lower risk of bias, and use of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to rate certainty in estimates of risk. The results will be incorporated in the upcoming European Association Urology Guideline on Thromboprophylaxis. Systematic review registration PROSPERO CRD42014010342 .
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsTikkinen et al.; licensee BioMed Central.
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.titleSystematic reviews of observational studies of risk of thrombosis and bleeding in urological surgery (ROTBUS): introduction and methodology
dc.typeJournal article
dc.date.updated2015-10-20T12:46:53Z
dc.creator.authorTikkinen, Kari A
dc.creator.authorAgarwal, Arnav
dc.creator.authorCraigie, Samantha
dc.creator.authorCartwright, Rufus
dc.creator.authorGould, Michael K
dc.creator.authorHaukka, Jari
dc.creator.authorNaspro, Richard
dc.creator.authorNovara, Giacomo
dc.creator.authorSandset, Per M
dc.creator.authorSiemieniuk, Reed A
dc.creator.authorViolette, Philippe D
dc.creator.authorGuyatt, Gordon H
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-3-150
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-51465
dc.type.documentTidsskriftartikkel
dc.type.peerreviewedPeer reviewed
dc.identifier.fulltextFulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/47351/1/13643_2014_Article_318.pdf
dc.type.versionPublishedVersion
cristin.articleid150


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata

Attribution 4.0 International
This item's license is: Attribution 4.0 International