Hide metadata

dc.contributor.authorCoolidge, Trilby
dc.contributor.authorSkaret, Erik
dc.contributor.authorHeima, Masahiro
dc.contributor.authorJohnson, Elissa K
dc.contributor.authorHillstead, M B
dc.contributor.authorFarjo, Nadia
dc.contributor.authorAsmyhr, Oyvind
dc.contributor.authorWeinstein, Philip
dc.date.accessioned2015-10-09T02:12:56Z
dc.date.available2015-10-09T02:12:56Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.citationBMC Oral Health. 2011 Jan 27;11(1):4
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/46769
dc.description.abstractBackground The Transtheoretical Model suggests that individuals vary according to their readiness to change behavior. Previous work in smoking cessation and other health areas suggests that interventions are more successful when they are tailored to an individual's stage of change with regards to the specific behavior. We report on the performance of a single-item measure ("Ladder") to assess the readiness to change dental-avoidant behavior. Methods An existing Contemplation Ladder for assessing stage of change in smoking cessation was modified to assess readiness to go to a dentist. The resulting Ladder was administered to samples of English-speaking adolescents (USA), Spanish-speaking adults (USA), and Norwegian military recruits (Norway) in order to assess construct validity. The Ladder was also administered to a sample of English-speaking avoidant adolescents and young adults who were enrolled in an intervention study (USA) in order to assess criterion validity. All participants also had dental examinations, and completed other questionnaires. Correlations, chi square, t tests and one-way ANOVAs were used to assess relationships between variables. Results In two samples, participants who do not go to the dentist had significantly more teeth with caries; in a third sample, participants who do not go to the dentist had significantly worse caries. Ladder scores were not significantly related to age, gender, caries, or dental fear. However, Ladder scores were significantly related to statements of intention to visit a dentist in the future and the importance of oral health. In a preliminary finding, Ladder scores at baseline also predicted whether or not the participants decided to go to a dentist in the intervention sample. Conclusions The data provide support for the convergent and divergent construct validity of the Ladder, and preliminary support for its criterion validity. The lack of relationship between dental fear and Ladder scores suggests that avoidant individuals may be helped to decide to go to a dentist using interventions which do not explicitly target their fear.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsCoolidge et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
dc.rightsAttribution 2.0 Generic
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/
dc.titleThinking about going to the dentist: a Contemplation Ladder to assess dentally-avoidant individuals' readiness to go to a dentist
dc.typeJournal article
dc.date.updated2015-10-09T02:12:57Z
dc.creator.authorCoolidge, Trilby
dc.creator.authorSkaret, Erik
dc.creator.authorHeima, Masahiro
dc.creator.authorJohnson, Elissa K
dc.creator.authorHillstead, M B
dc.creator.authorFarjo, Nadia
dc.creator.authorAsmyhr, Oyvind
dc.creator.authorWeinstein, Philip
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6831-11-4
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-50950
dc.type.documentTidsskriftartikkel
dc.type.peerreviewedPeer reviewed
dc.identifier.fulltextFulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/46769/1/12903_2010_Article_173.pdf
dc.type.versionPublishedVersion
cristin.articleid4


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata

Attribution 2.0 Generic
This item's license is: Attribution 2.0 Generic