Hide metadata

dc.contributor.authorHølen, Jacob C
dc.contributor.authorSaltvedt, Ingvild
dc.contributor.authorFayers, Peter M
dc.contributor.authorHjermstad, Marianne J
dc.contributor.authorLoge, Jon H
dc.contributor.authorKaasa, Stein
dc.date.accessioned2015-10-09T01:03:40Z
dc.date.available2015-10-09T01:03:40Z
dc.date.issued2007
dc.identifier.citationBMC Geriatrics. 2007 Dec 19;7(1):29
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/46342
dc.description.abstractBackground The Doloplus-2 is used for behavioural pain assessment in cognitively impaired patients. Little data exists on the psychometric properties of the Doloplus-2. Our objectives were to test the criterion validity and inter-rater reliability of the Doloplus-2, and to explore a design for validations of behavioural pain assessment tools. Methods Fifty-one nursing home patients and 22 patients admitted to a geriatric hospital ward were included. All were cognitively impaired and unable to self-report pain. Each patient was examined by an expert in pain evaluation and treatment, who rated the pain on a numerical rating scale. The ratings were based on information from the medical record, reports from nurses and patients (if possible) about pain during the past 24 hours, and a clinical examination. These ratings were used as pain criterion. The Doloplus-2 was administered by the attending nurse. Regression analyses were used to estimate the ability of the Doloplus-2 to explain the expert's ratings. The inter-rater reliability of the Doloplus-2 was evaluated in 16 patients by comparing the ratings of two nurses administrating the Doloplus-2. Results There was no association between the Doloplus-2 and the expert's pain ratings (R2 = 0.02). There was an association (R2 = 0.54) between the expert's ratings and the Doloplus-2 scores in a subgroup of 16 patients assessed by a geriatric expert nurse (the most experienced Doloplus-2 administrator). The inter-rater reliability between the Doloplus-2 administrators assessed by the intra-class coefficient was 0.77. The pain expert's ratings were compared with ratings of two independent geriatricians in a sub sample of 15, and were found satisfactory (intra-class correlation 0.74). Conclusion It was challenging to conduct such a study in patients with cognitive impairment and the study has several limitations. The results do not support the validity of the Doloplus-2 in its present version and they indicate that it demands specific administration skills.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsHolen et al.
dc.rightsAttribution 2.0 Generic
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/
dc.titleDoloplus-2, a valid tool for behavioural pain assessment?
dc.typeJournal article
dc.date.updated2015-10-09T01:03:40Z
dc.creator.authorHølen, Jacob C
dc.creator.authorSaltvedt, Ingvild
dc.creator.authorFayers, Peter M
dc.creator.authorHjermstad, Marianne J
dc.creator.authorLoge, Jon H
dc.creator.authorKaasa, Stein
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2318-7-29
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-50410
dc.type.documentTidsskriftartikkel
dc.type.peerreviewedPeer reviewed
dc.identifier.fulltextFulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/46342/1/12877_2007_Article_93.pdf
dc.type.versionPublishedVersion
cristin.articleid29


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata

Attribution 2.0 Generic
This item's license is: Attribution 2.0 Generic