Cesarean delivery : women's preferences and doctors' decisions
Metadata
Vis metadataFinnes i følgende samling
Sammendrag
Sammendrag ikke registrert.Artikkelliste
I. Fuglenes D, Øian P, Kristiansen IS: Obstetricians’ choice of cesarean delivery in ambiguous cases: is it influenced by risk attitude or fear of complaints and litigation? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009;200:48.e1-48e.8. The paper is removed from the thesis in DUO due to publisher restrictions. The published version is available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2008.07.021 |
II. Fuglenes D, Øian P, Gyrd-Hansen D, Olsen JA, Kristiansen IS. Norwegian obstetricians’ opinions about cesarean section on maternal request: should women pay themselves? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2010;89:1582-1588. The paper is removed from the thesis in DUO due to publisher restrictions. The published version is available at: https://doi.org/10.3109/00016349.2010.526181 |
III. Fuglenes D, Aas E, Øian P, Botten G, Kristiansen IS. Why do some pregnant women prefer cesarean? The influence of parity, delivery experiences and fear. Am J Obstet Gynecol, accepted for publication 2011. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Volume 205, Issue 1, July 2011, Pages 45.e1-45.e9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2011.03.043 |
IV. Fuglenes D, Aas E, Øian P, Botten G, Kristiansen IS. Maternal preference for cesarean; Do they get what they want? Manuscript, submitted. The paper is removed from the thesis in DUO due to publisher restrictions. |