Hide metadata

dc.contributor.authorSzulecki, Kacper
dc.contributor.authorNeerland, Maria A.
dc.contributor.authorTomter, Håkon
dc.contributor.authorWæringsaasen, Cecilie A. B.
dc.contributor.authorŻuk, Paweł
dc.contributor.authorŻuk, Piotr
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-18T05:04:38Z
dc.date.available2024-06-18T05:04:38Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.citationEnergy, Sustainability and Society. 2024 Jun 14;14(1):35
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/111123
dc.description.abstractBackground One of the potential dimensions on which exclusion and injustice may occur in energy transitions is age. Age-based patterns of exclusion—ageism—has recently been conceptualized in the context of decarbonization as energy ageism. This paper offers a comparative empirical analysis of the senior citizens’ outlook towards an imminent energy transition as well as the impact of energy poverty in two European countries: Norway and Poland. Results Drawing on interviews and focus groups with Polish and Norwegian seniors, we present the differences and similarities between the two countries, and the determinants of energy ageism, as well as the concept’s overall applicability and empirical usefulness. We find that socioeconomic conditions outweigh ageism, that is, the resilience of senior citizens in dealing with energy poverty during a transition is conditioned by their material standing and welfare state robustness rather than age based. An important factor is household heating technology, combined with economic vulnerability can push some individuals into energy poverty, while others using alternative sources of heat can navigate through energy crises unscathed. Conclusions We note the importance of mainstreaming social inclusion considerations in energy policy and of targeted digital competence building which can enhance senior citizen integration in the energy transition. Lower levels of digital competences among senior citizens certainly play a role and need to be addressed with education programs to increase participation. In both countries, household heating is a major issue and heating sources are strong predictors of energy poverty and regulatory measures and subsidies should be designed at national, regional, and municipal level to assist vulnerable groups in this area.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsThe Author(s); licensee Springer International Publishing Ltd.
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.titleAgeism, welfare, and the energy transition: a comparative analysis of the perceptions among the elderly in Poland and Norway
dc.typeJournal article
dc.date.updated2024-06-18T05:04:39Z
dc.creator.authorSzulecki, Kacper
dc.creator.authorNeerland, Maria A.
dc.creator.authorTomter, Håkon
dc.creator.authorWæringsaasen, Cecilie A. B.
dc.creator.authorŻuk, Paweł
dc.creator.authorŻuk, Piotr
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-024-00468-x
dc.type.documentTidsskriftartikkel
dc.type.peerreviewedPeer reviewed
dc.type.versionPublishedVersion
cristin.articleid35


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata

Attribution 4.0 International
This item's license is: Attribution 4.0 International