Hide metadata

dc.contributor.authorBockhop, Fabian
dc.contributor.authorGreving, Sven
dc.contributor.authorZeldovich, Marina
dc.contributor.authorKrenz, Ugne
dc.contributor.authorCunitz, Katrin
dc.contributor.authorTimmermann, Dagmar
dc.contributor.authorKieslich, Matthias
dc.contributor.authorAndelic, Nada
dc.contributor.authorBuchheim, Anna
dc.contributor.authorKoerte, Inga K.
dc.contributor.authorRoediger, Maike
dc.contributor.authorBrockmann, Knut
dc.contributor.authorBonfert, Michaela V.
dc.contributor.authorBerweck, Steffen
dc.contributor.authorLendt, Michael
dc.contributor.authorStaebler, Michael
dc.contributor.authorvon Steinbuechel, Nicole
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-23T05:03:38Z
dc.date.available2024-04-23T05:03:38Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.citationBMC Neurology. 2024 Apr 19;24(1):133
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/110629
dc.description.abstractBackground The German Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire (RPQ) can be used to assess post-concussion symptoms (PCS) after traumatic brain injury (TBI) in adults, adolescents, and children. Methods In this study, we examined the psychometric properties of the German RPQ proxy version (N = 146) for children (8—12 years) after TBI at the item, total and scale score level. Construct validity was analyzed using rank correlations with the proxy-assessed Post-Concussion Symptoms Inventory (PCSI-P), the Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9), and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale 7 (GAD-7). Furthermore, sensitivity testing was performed concerning subjects’ sociodemographic and injury-related characteristics. Differential item functioning (DIF) was analyzed to assess the comparability of RPQ proxy ratings for children with those for adolescents. Results Good internal consistency was demonstrated regarding Cronbach’s α (0.81—0.90) and McDonald’s ω (0.84—0.92). The factorial validity of a three-factor model was superior to the original one-factor model. Proxy ratings of the RPQ total and scale scores were strongly correlated with the PCSI-P (ϱ = 0.50—0.69), as well as moderately to strongly correlated with the PHQ-9 (ϱ = 0.49—0.65) and the GAD-7 (ϱ = 0.44—0.64). The DIF analysis revealed no relevant differences between the child and adolescent proxy versions. Conclusions The German RPQ proxy is a psychometrically reliable and valid instrument for assessing PCS in children after TBI. Therefore, RPQ self- and proxy-ratings can be used to assess PCS in childhood as well as along the lifespan of an individual after TBI.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsThe Author(s)
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.titleApplicability and clinical utility of the German rivermead post-concussion symptoms questionnaire in proxies of children after traumatic brain injury: an instrument validation study
dc.typeJournal article
dc.date.updated2024-04-23T05:03:39Z
dc.creator.authorBockhop, Fabian
dc.creator.authorGreving, Sven
dc.creator.authorZeldovich, Marina
dc.creator.authorKrenz, Ugne
dc.creator.authorCunitz, Katrin
dc.creator.authorTimmermann, Dagmar
dc.creator.authorKieslich, Matthias
dc.creator.authorAndelic, Nada
dc.creator.authorBuchheim, Anna
dc.creator.authorKoerte, Inga K.
dc.creator.authorRoediger, Maike
dc.creator.authorBrockmann, Knut
dc.creator.authorBonfert, Michaela V.
dc.creator.authorBerweck, Steffen
dc.creator.authorLendt, Michael
dc.creator.authorStaebler, Michael
dc.creator.authorvon Steinbuechel, Nicole
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-024-03587-2
dc.type.documentTidsskriftartikkel
dc.type.peerreviewedPeer reviewed
dc.type.versionPublishedVersion
cristin.articleid133


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata

Attribution 4.0 International
This item's license is: Attribution 4.0 International