Hide metadata

dc.contributor.authorZha, Sigurd Z.
dc.contributor.authorRogstadkjernet, Magnus
dc.contributor.authorKlæboe, Lars G.
dc.contributor.authorSkulstad, Helge
dc.contributor.authorSingstad, Bjørn-Jostein
dc.contributor.authorGilbert, Andrew
dc.contributor.authorEdvardsen, Thor
dc.contributor.authorSamset, Eigil
dc.contributor.authorBrekke, Pål H.
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-17T05:02:06Z
dc.date.available2023-10-17T05:02:06Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationCardiovascular Ultrasound. 2023 Oct 13;21(1):19
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/105563
dc.description.abstractBackground Measurement of the left ventricular outflow tract diameter (LVOTd) in echocardiography is a common source of error when used to calculate the stroke volume. The aim of this study is to assess whether a deep learning (DL) model, trained on a clinical echocardiographic dataset, can perform automatic LVOTd measurements on par with expert cardiologists. Methods Data consisted of 649 consecutive transthoracic echocardiographic examinations of patients with coronary artery disease admitted to a university hospital. 1304 LVOTd measurements in the parasternal long axis (PLAX) and zoomed parasternal long axis views (ZPLAX) were collected, with each patient having 1–6 measurements per examination. Data quality control was performed by an expert cardiologist, and spatial geometry data was preserved for each LVOTd measurement to convert DL predictions into metric units. A convolutional neural network based on the U-Net was used as the DL model. Results The mean absolute LVOTd error was 1.04 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.90–1.19) mm for DL predictions on the test set. The mean relative LVOTd errors across all data subgroups ranged from 3.8 to 5.1% for the test set. Generally, the DL model had superior performance on the ZPLAX view compared to the PLAX view. DL model precision for patients with repeated LVOTd measurements had a mean coefficient of variation of 2.2 (95% CI 1.6–2.7) %, which was comparable to the clinicians for the test set. Conclusion DL for automatic LVOTd measurements in PLAX and ZPLAX views is feasible when trained on a limited clinical dataset. While the DL predicted LVOTd measurements were within the expected range of clinical inter-observer variability, the robustness of the DL model requires validation on independent datasets. Future experiments using temporal information and anatomical constraints could improve valvular identification and reduce outliers, which are challenges that must be addressed before clinical utilization. Graphical Abstract
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsBioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.titleDeep learning for automated left ventricular outflow tract diameter measurements in 2D echocardiography
dc.typeJournal article
dc.date.updated2023-10-17T05:02:07Z
dc.creator.authorZha, Sigurd Z.
dc.creator.authorRogstadkjernet, Magnus
dc.creator.authorKlæboe, Lars G.
dc.creator.authorSkulstad, Helge
dc.creator.authorSingstad, Bjørn-Jostein
dc.creator.authorGilbert, Andrew
dc.creator.authorEdvardsen, Thor
dc.creator.authorSamset, Eigil
dc.creator.authorBrekke, Pål H.
dc.identifier.cristin2195794
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12947-023-00317-5
dc.type.documentTidsskriftartikkel
dc.type.peerreviewedPeer reviewed
dc.type.versionPublishedVersion
cristin.articleid19


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata

Attribution 4.0 International
This item's license is: Attribution 4.0 International