Hide metadata

dc.contributor.authorSeghers, P. A. L.
dc.contributor.authorAlibhai, Shabbir M. H.
dc.contributor.authorBattisti, Nicolò M. L.
dc.contributor.authorKanesvaran, Ravindran
dc.contributor.authorExtermann, Martine
dc.contributor.authorO’Donovan, Anita
dc.contributor.authorPilleron, Sophie
dc.contributor.authorMislang, Anna R.
dc.contributor.authorMusolino, Najia
dc.contributor.authorCheung, Kwok-Leung
dc.contributor.authorStaines, Anthony
dc.contributor.authorGirvalaki, Charis
dc.contributor.authorSoubeyran, Pierre
dc.contributor.authorPortielje, Johanneke E. A.
dc.contributor.authorRostoft, Siri
dc.contributor.authorHamaker, Marije E.
dc.contributor.authorTrépel, Dominic
dc.contributor.authorO’Hanlon, Shane
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-05T05:02:39Z
dc.date.available2023-09-05T05:02:39Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationGlobal Health Research and Policy. 2023 Sep 01;8(1):37
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/104334
dc.description.abstractMost cancers occur in older people and the burden in this age group is increasing. Over the past two decades the evidence on how best to treat this population has increased rapidly. However, implementation of new best practices has been slow and needs involvement of policymakers. This perspective paper explains why older people with cancer have different needs than the wider population. An overview is given of the recommended approach for older people with cancer and its benefits on clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness. In older patients, the geriatric assessment (GA) is the gold standard to measure level of fitness and to determine treatment tolerability. The GA, with multiple domains of physical health, functional status, psychological health and socio-environmental factors, prevents initiation of inappropriate oncologic treatment and recommends geriatric interventions to optimize the patient’s general health and thus resilience for receiving treatments. Multiple studies have proven its benefits such as reduced toxicity, better quality of life, better patient-centred communication and lower healthcare use. Although GA might require investment of time and resources, this is relatively small compared to the improved outcomes, possible cost-savings and compared to the large cost of oncologic treatments as a whole.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsWuhan University Global Health Institute; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.titleGeriatric assessment for older people with cancer: policy recommendations
dc.typeJournal article
dc.date.updated2023-09-05T05:02:39Z
dc.creator.authorSeghers, P. A. L.
dc.creator.authorAlibhai, Shabbir M. H.
dc.creator.authorBattisti, Nicolò M. L.
dc.creator.authorKanesvaran, Ravindran
dc.creator.authorExtermann, Martine
dc.creator.authorO’Donovan, Anita
dc.creator.authorPilleron, Sophie
dc.creator.authorMislang, Anna R.
dc.creator.authorMusolino, Najia
dc.creator.authorCheung, Kwok-Leung
dc.creator.authorStaines, Anthony
dc.creator.authorGirvalaki, Charis
dc.creator.authorSoubeyran, Pierre
dc.creator.authorPortielje, Johanneke E. A.
dc.creator.authorRostoft, Siri
dc.creator.authorHamaker, Marije E.
dc.creator.authorTrépel, Dominic
dc.creator.authorO’Hanlon, Shane
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s41256-023-00323-0
dc.type.documentTidsskriftartikkel
dc.type.peerreviewedPeer reviewed
dc.type.versionPublishedVersion
cristin.articleid37


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata

Attribution 4.0 International
This item's license is: Attribution 4.0 International