Skjul metadata

dc.contributor.authorMyhrvold, Birgitte L.
dc.contributor.authorVøllestad, Nina K.
dc.contributor.authorIrgens, Pernille
dc.contributor.authorRobinson, Hilde S.
dc.contributor.authorAxén, Iben
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-05T05:02:35Z
dc.date.available2023-09-05T05:02:35Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationChiropractic & Manual Therapies. 2023 Aug 31;31(1):33
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/104330
dc.description.abstractBackground Chiropractors’ clinical indicators for recommending preventive continued care to patients with low back pain include previous pain episodes, a history of long pain duration and improvement after initial treatment. Our objectives were, in a cohort of patients with neck pain, to examine whether these clinical indicators were associated with being recommended continued care beyond 4 weeks, and if so whether this recommendation was dependent of chiropractor characteristics, as well as if the number of clinical indicators influenced this recommendation. Methods In this multi-center observational study, 172 patients seeking care for a new episode of neck pain in chiropractic practice in Norway were included between September 2015 and May 2016. The chiropractors treated their patients as per usual, and for this study, baseline data and 4-week follow-up data were used. Patient data included the clinical indicators (1) previous episodes of neck pain, (2) a history of long duration neck pain and (3) improvement four weeks after initial treatment. The recruiting chiropractors were asked at 4-week follow-up if each patient was recommended continued care, defined as care planned beyond the first 4 weeks. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression models investigated the association between clinical indicators and the continued care recommendation, as well as the influence of chiropractor characteristics on this recommendation. Cross tabulations investigated the relationship between the number of indicators present and recommendation of continued care. Results Long duration of neck pain was the strongest clinical indicator for being recommended continued care 4 weeks after the initial treatment. Chiropractor characteristics were not associated with this recommendation. In patients with all three clinical indicators present, 39% were recommended continued care. When two and one indicators were present, the percentages of those recommended continued care were 25% and 10%, respectively. Conclusion Chiropractors recommended continued care for patients experiencing neck pain based on their history of long pain duration, and this was not influenced by characteristics of the chiropractor. This differs from previous studies of indicators for maintenance care in patients with low back pain.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsChiropractic and Osteopathic College of Australasia, European Academy of Chiropractic, The Royal College of Chiropractors, Nordic Institute of Chiropractic and Clinical Biomechanics and BioMed Central Ltd.
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.titleClinical indicators for recommending continued care to patients with neck pain in chiropractic practice: a cohort study
dc.typeJournal article
dc.date.updated2023-09-05T05:02:36Z
dc.creator.authorMyhrvold, Birgitte L.
dc.creator.authorVøllestad, Nina K.
dc.creator.authorIrgens, Pernille
dc.creator.authorRobinson, Hilde S.
dc.creator.authorAxén, Iben
dc.identifier.cristin2188245
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12998-023-00507-y
dc.type.documentTidsskriftartikkel
dc.type.peerreviewedPeer reviewed
dc.type.versionPublishedVersion
cristin.articleid33


Tilhørende fil(er)

Finnes i følgende samling

Skjul metadata

Attribution 4.0 International
Dette verket har følgende lisens: Attribution 4.0 International