Hide metadata

dc.contributor.authorHofmann, Bjørn
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-07T06:02:07Z
dc.date.available2023-03-07T06:02:07Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationBMC Medical Ethics. 2023 Mar 06;24(1):17
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/100963
dc.description.abstractGiven that biases can distort bioethics work, it has received surprisingly little and fragmented attention compared to in other fields of research. This article provides an overview of potentially relevant biases in bioethics, such as cognitive biases, affective biases, imperatives, and moral biases. Special attention is given to moral biases, which are discussed in terms of (1) Framings, (2) Moral theory bias, (3) Analysis bias, (4) Argumentation bias, and (5) Decision bias. While the overview is not exhaustive and the taxonomy by no means is absolute, it provides initial guidance with respect to assessing the relevance of various biases for specific kinds of bioethics work. One reason why we should identify and address biases in bioethics is that it can help us assess and improve the quality of bioethics work.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsThe Author(s)
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.titleBiases in bioethics: a narrative review
dc.typeJournal article
dc.date.updated2023-03-07T06:02:07Z
dc.creator.authorHofmann, Bjørn
dc.identifier.cristin2141127
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-023-00894-0
dc.type.documentTidsskriftartikkel
dc.type.peerreviewedPeer reviewed
dc.type.versionPublishedVersion
cristin.articleid17


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata

Attribution 4.0 International
This item's license is: Attribution 4.0 International