Hide metadata

dc.date.accessioned2023-02-04T17:34:24Z
dc.date.available2023-02-04T17:34:24Z
dc.date.created2022-11-01T09:43:09Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationCramer, Becky Yilma, Zelealem Belaineh Lifjeld, Jan Terje . Selection on sperm size in response to promiscuity and variation in female sperm storage organs. Journal of Evolutionary Biology. 2022, 36(1), 131-143
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/99649
dc.description.abstractSperm cells are exceptionally morphologically diverse across taxa. However, morphology can be quite uniform within species, particularly for species where females copulate with many males per reproductive bout. Strong sexual selection in these promiscuous species is widely hypothesized to reduce intraspecific sperm variation. Conversely, we hypothesize that intraspecific sperm size variation may be maintained by high among-female variation in the size of sperm storage organs, assuming that paternity success improves when sperm are compatible in size with the sperm storage organ. We use individual-based simulations and an analytical model to evaluate how selection on sperm size depends on promiscuity level and variation in sperm storage organ size (hereafter, female preference variation). Simulations of high promiscuity (10 mates per female) showed stabilizing selection on sperm when female preference variation was low, and disruptive selection when female preference variation was high, consistent with the analytical model results. With low promiscuity (2–3 mates per female), selection on sperm was stabilizing for all levels of female preference variation in the simulations, contrasting with the analytical model. Promiscuity level, or mate sampling, thus has a strong impact on the selection resulting from female preferences. Furthermore, when promiscuity is low, disruptive selection on male traits will occur under much more limited circumstances (i.e. only with higher among-female variation) than many previous models suggest. Variation in female sperm storage organs likely has strong implications for intraspecific sperm variation in highly promiscuous species, but likely does not explain differences in intraspecific sperm variation for less promiscuous taxa.
dc.languageEN
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.titleSelection on sperm size in response to promiscuity and variation in female sperm storage organs
dc.title.alternativeENEngelskEnglishSelection on sperm size in response to promiscuity and variation in female sperm storage organs
dc.typeJournal article
dc.creator.authorCramer, Becky
dc.creator.authorYilma, Zelealem Belaineh
dc.creator.authorLifjeld, Jan Terje
cristin.unitcode185,28,8,7
cristin.unitnameEvolusjonær kjønnsforskning - SERG
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2
dc.identifier.cristin2067173
dc.identifier.bibliographiccitationinfo:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Journal of Evolutionary Biology&rft.volume=36&rft.spage=131&rft.date=2022
dc.identifier.jtitleJournal of Evolutionary Biology
dc.identifier.volume36
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.startpage131
dc.identifier.endpage143
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.14120
dc.type.documentTidsskriftartikkel
dc.type.peerreviewedPeer reviewed
dc.source.issn1010-061X
dc.type.versionPublishedVersion
dc.relation.projectNFR/301592


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata

Attribution 4.0 International
This item's license is: Attribution 4.0 International