Hide metadata

dc.date.accessioned2023-01-30T17:30:40Z
dc.date.available2023-01-30T17:30:40Z
dc.date.created2023-01-24T21:23:45Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationPajalic, Zada Agular de Sousa, Diana Sørensen Strøm, Benedicte Lausund, Hilde Breievne, Grete Kisa, Sezer Saplacan, Diana Hamilton Larsen, Marie Jøranson, Nina . Welfare technology interventions among older people living at home—A systematic review of RCT studies. PLOS Digital Health. 2023
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/99427
dc.description.abstractThe main goal of health services is for the elderly to maintain their mental and physical health and live at home independently for as long as possible. Various technical welfare solutions have been introduced and tested to support an independent life. The aim of this systematic review was to examine different types of interventions and assess the effectiveness of welfare technology (WT) interventions for older people living at home. This study was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD42020190316) and followed the PRISMA statement. Primary randomized control trial (RCT) studies published between 2015 and 2020 were identified through the following databases: Academic, AMED, Cochrane Reviews, EBSCOhost, EMBASE, Google Scholar, Ovid MEDLINE via PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Twelve out of 687 papers met the criteria for eligibility. We used risk-of-bias assessment (RoB 2) for the included studies. Based on the RoB 2 outcomes that showed a high risk of bias (>50%) and high heterogeneity of quantitative data, we decided to narratively summarize the study characteristics, outcome measures, and implications for practice. The included studies were conducted in six countries, namely the USA, Sweden, Korea, Italy, Singapore, and the UK. One was conducted in three European countries (the Netherlands, Sweden, and Switzerland). A total of 8437 participants were sampled, and individual study sample sizes ranged from 12 to 6742. Most of the studies were two-armed RCTs, except for two that were three-armed. The duration of the welfare technology tested in the studies ranged from four weeks to six months. The employed technologies were commercial solutions, including telephones, smartphones, computers, telemonitors, and robots. The type of interventions were balance training, physical exercise and function, cognitive training, monitoring of symptoms, activation of emergency medical systems, self-care, reduction of death risk, and medical alert protection systems. The latter studies were the first of their kind and suggested that physician-led telemonitoring could reduce length of hospital stay. In summary, welfare technology seems to offer solutions to supporting elderly people at home. The results showed a wide range of uses for technologies for improving mental and physical health. All studies showed encouraging results for improving the participants’ health status.
dc.languageEN
dc.publisherPLOS
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.titleWelfare technology interventions among older people living at home—A systematic review of RCT studies
dc.title.alternativeENEngelskEnglishWelfare technology interventions among older people living at home—A systematic review of RCT studies
dc.typeJournal article
dc.creator.authorPajalic, Zada
dc.creator.authorAgular de Sousa, Diana
dc.creator.authorSørensen Strøm, Benedicte
dc.creator.authorLausund, Hilde
dc.creator.authorBreievne, Grete
dc.creator.authorKisa, Sezer
dc.creator.authorSaplacan, Diana
dc.creator.authorHamilton Larsen, Marie
dc.creator.authorJøranson, Nina
cristin.unitcode185,15,5,46
cristin.unitnameForskningsgruppe for robotikk og intelligente systemer
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.cristin2114330
dc.identifier.bibliographiccitationinfo:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=PLOS Digital Health&rft.volume=&rft.spage=&rft.date=2023
dc.identifier.jtitlePLOS Digital Health
dc.identifier.volume2
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000184
dc.type.documentTidsskriftartikkel
dc.type.peerreviewedPeer reviewed
dc.source.issn2767-3170
dc.type.versionPublishedVersion
cristin.articleide0000184


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata

Attribution 4.0 International
This item's license is: Attribution 4.0 International