Hide metadata

dc.date.accessioned2023-01-09T18:02:38Z
dc.date.available2023-01-09T18:02:38Z
dc.date.created2022-05-11T13:25:58Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationWolf, J. Helland, Åslaug Oh, I.-J. Migliorino, M.R. Dziadziuszko, R. Wrona, A. de Castro, Castro Mazieres, J. Griesinger, F. Chlistalla, M. Cardona, A. Ruf, T. Trunzer, K. Smoljanovic, V. Novello, S. . Final efficacy and safety data, and exploratory molecular profiling from the phase III ALUR study of alectinib versus chemotherapy in crizotinib-pretreated ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer. ESMO Open. 2022, 7(1)
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/98589
dc.description.abstractBackground At the primary data cut-off, the ALUR study demonstrated significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) and central nervous system (CNS) objective response rate (ORR) with alectinib versus chemotherapy in pretreated, advanced anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small-cell lung cancer. We report final efficacy and safety data, and exploratory molecular profiling. Patients and methods Patients who received prior platinum-doublet chemotherapy and crizotinib were randomized 2 : 1 to receive alectinib 600 mg twice daily (n = 79) or chemotherapy (pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 or docetaxel 75 mg/m2, every 3 weeks; n = 40) until progressive disease, death or withdrawal. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed PFS. Secondary endpoints included ORR, CNS ORR and safety. Plasma samples were collected at baseline, then every 6 weeks until progressive disease; molecular factors detected by next-generation sequencing were correlated with outcomes. Results Investigator-assessed PFS was significantly longer with alectinib than chemotherapy (median 10.9 versus 1.4 months; hazard ratio 0.20, 95% confidence interval 0.12-0.33; P < 0.001). ORR was 50.6% with alectinib versus 2.5% with chemotherapy (P < 0.001). In patients with measurable CNS metastases at baseline, CNS ORR was 66.7% with alectinib versus 0% with chemotherapy (P < 0.001). No new safety signals were seen. ALK rearrangement was identified in 69.5% (n = 41/59) of baseline plasma samples. Confirmed partial responses were observed with alectinib in 6/11 patients with a secondary ALK mutation and 4/6 patients with a non-EML4-ALK (where EML4 is echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 4) fusion. Detection of mutant TP53 in baseline plasma resulted in numerically shorter PFS with alectinib (hazard ratio 1.88, 95% confidence interval 0.9-3.93). Conclusions Final efficacy data from ALUR confirmed the superior PFS, ORR and CNS ORR of alectinib versus chemotherapy in pretreated, advanced ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer. Alectinib prolonged PFS versus chemotherapy in patients with wild-type or mutant TP53; however, alectinib activity was considerably decreased in patients with mutant TP53.
dc.languageEN
dc.publisherBMJ
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.titleFinal efficacy and safety data, and exploratory molecular profiling from the phase III ALUR study of alectinib versus chemotherapy in crizotinib-pretreated ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer
dc.title.alternativeENEngelskEnglishFinal efficacy and safety data, and exploratory molecular profiling from the phase III ALUR study of alectinib versus chemotherapy in crizotinib-pretreated ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer
dc.typeJournal article
dc.creator.authorWolf, J.
dc.creator.authorHelland, Åslaug
dc.creator.authorOh, I.-J.
dc.creator.authorMigliorino, M.R.
dc.creator.authorDziadziuszko, R.
dc.creator.authorWrona, A.
dc.creator.authorde Castro, Castro
dc.creator.authorMazieres, J.
dc.creator.authorGriesinger, F.
dc.creator.authorChlistalla, M.
dc.creator.authorCardona, A.
dc.creator.authorRuf, T.
dc.creator.authorTrunzer, K.
dc.creator.authorSmoljanovic, V.
dc.creator.authorNovello, S.
cristin.unitcode185,53,49,12
cristin.unitnameKreftforskning
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.cristin2023573
dc.identifier.bibliographiccitationinfo:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=ESMO Open&rft.volume=7&rft.spage=&rft.date=2022
dc.identifier.jtitleESMO Open
dc.identifier.volume7
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.pagecount0
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100333
dc.type.documentTidsskriftartikkel
dc.type.peerreviewedPeer reviewed
dc.source.issn2059-7029
dc.type.versionPublishedVersion
cristin.articleid100333


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
This item's license is: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International