Hide metadata

dc.date.accessioned2023-01-02T18:01:41Z
dc.date.available2023-01-02T18:01:41Z
dc.date.created2022-10-13T19:46:43Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationStokke, Caroline Nørgaard, Jakob Nordberg Feiring Phillips, Hilde Sherwani, Alexander Gul Nuruddin, Syed Mohammad Connelly, James Pattrick Schjesvold, Fredrik Hellem Rootwelt-Revheim, Mona Elisabeth . Comparison of [18F]fluciclovine and [18F]FDG PET/CT in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients. Molecular Imaging and Biology. 2022, 24(5), 842-851
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/98415
dc.description.abstractAbstract Purpose [ 18 F]FDG PET/CT in multiple myeloma (MM) is currently the best technology to demonstrate patchy and extramedullary disease. However, [ 18 F]FDG PET has some limitations, and imaging with alternative tracers should be explored. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the performance of [ 18 F]fluciclovine PET compared to [ 18 F]FDG PET in newly diagnosed MM patients. Procedures Thirteen newly diagnosed transplant eligible MM patients were imaged both with [ 18 F]FDG PET/CT and [ 18 F]fluciclovine PET/CT within 1 week in a prospective study. The subjects were visually assessed positive or negative for disease. The number of lesions and the SUV max of selected lesions were measured for both tracers. Furthermore, tracer uptake ratios were obtained by dividing lesion SUV max by blood or bone marrow SUV max . Between-group differences and correlations were assessed with paired t -tests and Pearson tests. Bone marrow SUVs were compared to bone marrow plasma cell percentage in biopsy samples. Results Nine subjects were assessed positively by [ 18 F]FDG PET (69%) and 12 positives by [ 18 F]fluciclovine PET (92%). All positive subjects had [ 18 F]fluciclovine scans that were qualitatively scored as easier to interpret visually than the [ 18 F]FDG scans. The number of lesions was also higher; seven of nine subjects with distinct hot spots on [ 18 F]fluciclovine PET had fewer or no visible lesions on [ 18 F]FDG PET. The mean lesion SUV max values were 8.2 and 3.8 for [ 18 F]fluciclovine and [ 18 F]FDG, respectively. The mean tumour to blood values were 6.4 and 2.0 for [ 18 F]fluciclovine and [ 18 F]FDG, and the mean ratios between tumour and bone marrow were 2.1 and 1.5 for [ 18 F]fluciclovine and [ 18 F]FDG. The lesion SUV max and ratios were significantly higher for [ 18 F]fluciclovine (all p  < 0.01). Local [ 18 F]fluciclovine SUV max or SUV mean values in os ilium and the percentage of plasma cells in bone marrow biopsies were linearly correlated ( p  = 0.048). There were no significant correlations between [ 18 F]FDG SUVs and plasma cells ( p  = 0.82). Conclusions Based on this pilot study, [ 18 F]fluciclovine is a promising tracer for MM. The visual and semi-quantitative evaluations indicate that [ 18 F]fluciclovine PET/CT can out-perform [ 18 F]FDG PET/CT at diagnosis.
dc.languageEN
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.titleComparison of [18F]fluciclovine and [18F]FDG PET/CT in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients
dc.title.alternativeENEngelskEnglishComparison of [18F]fluciclovine and [18F]FDG PET/CT in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients
dc.typeJournal article
dc.creator.authorStokke, Caroline
dc.creator.authorNørgaard, Jakob Nordberg
dc.creator.authorFeiring Phillips, Hilde
dc.creator.authorSherwani, Alexander Gul
dc.creator.authorNuruddin, Syed Mohammad
dc.creator.authorConnelly, James Pattrick
dc.creator.authorSchjesvold, Fredrik Hellem
dc.creator.authorRootwelt-Revheim, Mona Elisabeth
cristin.unitcode185,15,4,50
cristin.unitnameBiofysikk og medisinsk fysikk
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.cristin2061312
dc.identifier.bibliographiccitationinfo:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Molecular Imaging and Biology&rft.volume=24&rft.spage=842&rft.date=2022
dc.identifier.jtitleMolecular Imaging and Biology
dc.identifier.volume24
dc.identifier.issue5
dc.identifier.startpage842
dc.identifier.endpage851
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11307-022-01734-0
dc.type.documentTidsskriftartikkel
dc.type.peerreviewedPeer reviewed
dc.source.issn1536-1632
dc.type.versionPublishedVersion


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata

Attribution 4.0 International
This item's license is: Attribution 4.0 International