Hide metadata

dc.date.accessioned2022-12-07T16:05:25Z
dc.date.available2022-12-07T16:05:25Z
dc.date.created2022-11-13T10:40:29Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationRubio Fernandez, Paula . Demonstrative systems: From linguistic typology to social cognition. Cognitive Psychology. 2022
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/97930
dc.description.abstractThis study explores the connection between language and social cognition by empirically testing different typological analyses of various demonstrative systems. Linguistic typology classifies demonstrative systems as distance-oriented or person-oriented, depending on whether they indicate the location of a referent relative only to the speaker, or to both the speaker and the listener. From the perspective of social cognition, speakers of languages with person-oriented systems must monitor their listener’s spatial location in order to accurately use their demonstratives, while speakers of languages with distance-oriented systems can use demonstratives from their own, egocentric perspective. Resolving an ongoing controversy around the nature of the Spanish demonstrative system, the results of Experiment 1 confirmed that this demonstrative system is person oriented, while the English system is distance oriented. Experiment 2 revealed that not all three-way demonstrative systems are person oriented, with Japanese speakers showing sensitivity to the listener’s spatial location, while Turkish speakers did not show such an effect in their demonstrative choice. In Experiment 3, Catalan-Spanish bilinguals showed sensitivity to listener position in their choice of the Spanish distal form, but not in their choice of the medial form. These results were interpreted as a transfer effect from Catalan, which revealed analogous results to English. Experiment 4 investigated the use of demonstratives to redirect a listener’s attention to the intended referent, which is a universal function of demonstratives that also hinges on social cognition. Japanese and Spanish speakers chose between their proximal and distal demonstratives flexibly, depending on whether the listener was looking closer or further from the referent, whereas Turkish speakers chose their medial form for attention correction. In conclusion, the results of this study support the view that investigating how speakers of different languages jointly use language and social cognition in communication has the potential to unravel the deep connection between these two fundamentally human capacities.
dc.languageEN
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.titleDemonstrative systems: From linguistic typology to social cognition
dc.title.alternativeENEngelskEnglishDemonstrative systems: From linguistic typology to social cognition
dc.typeJournal article
dc.creator.authorRubio Fernandez, Paula
cristin.unitcode185,14,33,0
cristin.unitnameIFIKK
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2
dc.identifier.cristin2072911
dc.identifier.bibliographiccitationinfo:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Cognitive Psychology&rft.volume=&rft.spage=&rft.date=2022
dc.identifier.jtitleCognitive Psychology
dc.identifier.volume139
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2022.101519
dc.type.documentTidsskriftartikkel
dc.type.peerreviewedPeer reviewed
dc.source.issn0010-0285
dc.type.versionPublishedVersion
cristin.articleid101519


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata

Attribution 4.0 International
This item's license is: Attribution 4.0 International