Hide metadata

dc.date.accessioned2013-03-12T08:14:39Z
dc.date.issued2007en_US
dc.date.submitted2007-11-02en_US
dc.identifier.citationSingh, Tina Amandeep, Singh, May Leena, . Brukeropplæring & digital kompetanse. Masteroppgave, University of Oslo, 2007en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/9791
dc.description.abstractAbstract Microsoft Word has been used a lot for a long period of time, but still we can hear complaints from the users, where they for instance say that they cannot find the file they know they saved. And if they take advantage of a new updated version of the software, they often feel uncomfortable and insecure of using it. There is a lack of basic understanding, and people are still getting problems in using a software in spite of attending a course for the specific software (Sein et al, 1998). Understanding is here defined as the ability to transfer learning from one program to another. The aim of this thesis is to find out whether a course which - uses of metaphors instead of and in addition to usual computer expressions - emphasizes similarities between the programs can give the users a better understanding In this case we first trained 13 users in MS Word and then used the knowledge from this course to teach MS Excel and MS Power Point. Observation of one pilot project and one main course including MS Word, Excel and PowerPoint at a postgraduate college in Oslo was conducted. One month after the last course we sent out a questionnaire to the participants. After the course we modified the six-level knowledge content hierarchy which was proposed by Sein et al. (1998). The modification is done based on the experience and knowledge we have attained during this project. The course participants were able to transfer skills from Word to Excel and PowerPoint, so they developed the kind of understanding aimed at. These learning results are at a deeper level than what the European Computer Driving License (Datakortet) requires. The learning results spanned all six levels in the hierarchy of software knowledge proposed by Sein et al (1998). The fourth, conceptual level was specified as knowledge about similarities between programs. The sixth level, motivational, was found to be included in the fourth and fifth level.nor
dc.language.isonoben_US
dc.titleBrukeropplæring & digital kompetanse : - Overføring av læring mellom programmer i Office-pakkenen_US
dc.typeMaster thesisen_US
dc.date.updated2008-03-07en_US
dc.creator.authorSingh, Tina Amandeepen_US
dc.creator.authorSingh, May Leenaen_US
dc.date.embargoenddate10000-01-01
dc.rights.termsDette dokumentet er ikke elektronisk tilgjengelig etter ønske fra forfatter. Tilgangskode/Access code Aen_US
dc.rights.termsforeveren_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::420en_US
dc.identifier.bibliographiccitationinfo:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&rft.au=Singh, Tina Amandeep&rft.au=Singh, May Leena&rft.title=Brukeropplæring & digital kompetanse&rft.inst=University of Oslo&rft.date=2007&rft.degree=Masteroppgaveen_US
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-18556en_US
dc.type.documentMasteroppgaveen_US
dc.identifier.duo67111en_US
dc.contributor.supervisorJens Kaasbøllen_US
dc.identifier.bibsys071625240en_US
dc.rights.accessrightsclosedaccessen_US
dc.identifier.fulltextFulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/9791/2/Singh.pdf


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata