Hide metadata

dc.date.accessioned2022-10-13T07:35:43Z
dc.date.available2022-10-13T07:35:43Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.isbn978-82-348-0075-7
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/97227
dc.description.abstractWomen with FGC, particularly those subjected to the most severe type (i.e., infibulation), require specialized healthcare interventions such as deinfibulation, a minor surgical procedure performed to prevent or manage maternal and non-maternally related health problems. Seven women’s outpatient clinics in Norway offer deinfibulation by gynecologists with FGC competence. To assess women’s access to these clinics for non-maternal purposes, Mai M. Ziyada conducted repeat semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions with Somali and Sudanese participants and analyzed quantitative cross-sectional online survey data among GPs in Norway. Somali and Sudanese women were motivated to seek healthcare for problems that persisted despite self-management attempts, interfered with their ability to perform expected duties and roles, and caused severe pain. However, lack of knowledge on FGC-related health problems or contradicting information from doctors and peers hindered their identification of these problems as FGC-related; and, subsequently, whether to seek help at FGC-specialized clinics. Instead, they went to their GPs, expecting them to assess whether their health problems were FGC-related. Unfortunately, the women and GPs commonly missed these early opportunities for assessment because of feelings of shame and mutual embarrassment. GPs with experience with patients with FGC-related problems and adequate self-assessed knowledge of FGC typology and medical codes were more likely to consider FGC a potential cause of health problems. Finally, at the FGC-specialized clinics, sexual norms primarily influenced the women’s intentions or decisions to accept or refuse deinfibulation. Another factor that influenced the women’s decisions was their satisfaction with the healthcare providers (e.g., addressing their fears and concerns regarding aesthetics, re-traumatization, and pain). In addition, the findings indicated unmet needs for psychosexual counseling.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.haspartArticle 1. Ziyada MM, Johansen REB (2021). Barriers and facilitators to the access to specialized Female Genital Cutting healthcare services: Experiences of Somali and Sudanese women in Norway. PloS ONE. 2021;16(9): e0257588. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257588. The article is included in the thesis. Also available at: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257588
dc.relation.haspartArticle II. Ziyada MM, Lien IL, Johansen REB. Sexual norms and the intention to use healthcare services related to female genital cutting: A qualitative study among Somali and Sudanese women in Norway. PloS ONE. 2020;15(5):e0233440. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233440. The article is included in the thesis. Also available at: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233440
dc.relation.haspartArticle III. Ziyada MM, Johansen REB, Berthelsen M, Lien IL, Bendiksen, B. Factors associated with general practitioners’ routines and comfortability with assessing female genital cutting: A cross-sectional survey. Manuscript. To be published. The paper is not available in DUO awaiting publishing.
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257588
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233440
dc.titleAccess to female genital cutting specialized services in Norwayen_US
dc.typeDoctoral thesisen_US
dc.creator.authorZiyada, Mai Mahgoub
dc.type.documentDoktoravhandlingen_US


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata