The Significance of State Consent for the Legitimate Authority of Customary International Law

dc.date.accessioned	2022-08-23T15:19:04Z
dc.date.available	2022-08-23T15:19:04Z
dc.date.created	2022-08-18T10:13:39Z
dc.date.issued	2022
dc.identifier.citation	Føllesdal, Andreas . The Significance of State Consent for the Legitimate Authority of Customary International Law. The Theory, Practice, and Interpretation of Customary International Law. 2022, 105-136 Cambridge University Press
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10852/95542
dc.description.abstract	Sovereign States are under a legal obligation to comply with customary international law even though they have not explicitly consented to these norms. How should international courts accommodate both such non-consent-based CIL and a commitment to state sovereignty? The article outlines one strategy that avoids or helps address challenges wrought against other attempts to create more consistency and coherence between CIL and the other sources of international law – whilst securing a central role for state consent. A plausible account of why states have an obligation to honour treaties they consent to also contributes to justify their obligation to honour CIL norms. The shared normative basis for both sorts of obligations may be a ‘Principle of Non-manipulation’, a norm to not violate intentionally created rightful expectations. The account draws much on Scanlon, MacCormick and Hart.
dc.description.abstract	The Significance of State Consent for the Legitimate Authority of Customary International Law
dc.language	EN
dc.publisher	Cambridge University Press
dc.rights	Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
dc.rights.uri	https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.title	The Significance of State Consent for the Legitimate Authority of Customary International Law
dc.title.alternative	ENEngelskEnglishThe Significance of State Consent for the Legitimate Authority of Customary International Law
dc.type	Chapter
dc.creator.author	Føllesdal, Andreas
cristin.unitcode	185,12,5,10
cristin.unitname	PluriCourts
cristin.ispublished	true
cristin.fulltext	original
dc.identifier.cristin	2044049
dc.identifier.bibliographiccitation	info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.btitle=The Theory, Practice, and Interpretation of Customary International Law&rft.spage=105&rft.date=2022
dc.identifier.startpage	105
dc.identifier.endpage	136
dc.identifier.pagecount	604
dc.identifier.doi	https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009025416.007
dc.identifier.urn	URN:NBN:no-98077
dc.type.document	Bokkapittel
dc.type.peerreviewed	Peer reviewed
dc.source.isbn	9781009025416
dc.identifier.fulltext	Fulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/95542/1/Follesdal%2B2022%2Bthe-significance-of-state-consent-for-the-legitimate-authority-of-customary-international-law.pdf
dc.type.version	PublishedVersion
cristin.btitle	The Theory, Practice, and Interpretation of Customary International Law
dc.relation.project	NFR/223274