Hide metadata

dc.date.accessioned2013-03-12T08:02:01Z
dc.date.available2013-03-12T08:02:01Z
dc.date.issued2005en_US
dc.date.submitted2005-11-17en_US
dc.identifier.citationArnarsdottir, Kristrun. Semantic mapping: ontology-based vs. model-based. Hovedoppgave, University of Oslo, 2005en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/9361
dc.description.abstractHow to enable enterprises to interchange autonomously designed information addressing the same domain, is an active research area. Present technology allows enterprises to exchange data, but when it comes to interpreting the content or understanding the data, there is a problem. This problem has to do with semantic interoperability; enabling computers to understand the meaning of information being exchanged. Two recent initiatives make promises regarding interoperability issues. Ontologies have been adopted by the field of Artificial Intelligence (AI), and play an important role when envisioning a computer-understandable and executable Web referred to as the Semantic Web. An ontology and related technology is to directly address semantic issues by providing an explicitly defined meaning of available services and the information to be exchanged. The Model Driven Architecture (MDA) on the other hand, addresses interoperability by addressing the conflicts introduced due to the different technological platforms chosen when implementing systems. The MDA framework enables developers to carry out their work at a higher abstraction level as well as applying model transformations to automatically generate technology-dependent parts of systems. Semantic mapping denotes the task of capturing relationships between semantically similar terms in different data sources as well as supplying the techniques needed to convert between them. This thesis investigates how ontology is used in relation to semantic mapping with emphasis on what distinguishes the ontology-based approach from the MDA approach. An effort is made to explain what ontology denotes within the field of AI as well as to compare the ontology technology used to construct and apply ontologies, to the model transformation technology available within the MDA framework. This thesis is also meant to give the reader a good understanding of the challenges involved when trying to achieve semantic interoperability between enterprises. The main contribution of this thesis is the account of similarities and dissimilarities between the ontology-based approach and the MDA approach to semantic mapping. Important questions are whether those two are alternative approaches, or whether they may be combined in a value-adding way.nor
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.titleSemantic mapping: ontology-based vs. model-based : Alternative or complementary approaches?en_US
dc.typeMaster thesisen_US
dc.date.updated2006-01-06en_US
dc.creator.authorArnarsdottir, Kristrunen_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::420en_US
dc.identifier.bibliographiccitationinfo:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&rft.au=Arnarsdottir, Kristrun&rft.title=Semantic mapping: ontology-based vs. model-based&rft.inst=University of Oslo&rft.date=2005&rft.degree=Hovedoppgaveen_US
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-11474en_US
dc.type.documentHovedoppgaveen_US
dc.identifier.duo32962en_US
dc.contributor.supervisorBerre, Arne-Jørgenen_US
dc.identifier.bibsys060048271en_US
dc.identifier.fulltextFulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/9361/3/Mythesis_r31.pdf


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata