Hide metadata

dc.date.accessioned2022-04-01T17:28:08Z
dc.date.available2022-04-01T17:28:08Z
dc.date.created2021-11-25T09:49:14Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationGürakar-Skribeland, Özlem . Turkey: Party or Non-party State?. Forced Migration Review (FMR). 2021, 67, 46-48
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/93187
dc.description.abstractSomewhere between party and non-party to the Refugee Convention, Turkey is a rather unique case from the perspective of refugee law and practice, with its protection regime fundamentally shaped by the Refugee Convention and the optional geographical limitation allowed under it.
dc.languageEN
dc.publisherRefugee Studies Centre Oxford, Department of International Development, University of Oxford
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.titleTurkey: Party or Non-party State?
dc.typeJournal article
dc.creator.authorGürakar-Skribeland, Özlem
cristin.unitcode185,12,1,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for kriminologi og rettssosiologi
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.cristin1958822
dc.identifier.bibliographiccitationinfo:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Forced Migration Review (FMR)&rft.volume=67&rft.spage=46&rft.date=2021
dc.identifier.jtitleForced Migration Review (FMR)
dc.identifier.volume67
dc.identifier.startpage46
dc.identifier.endpage48
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-95741
dc.type.documentTidsskriftartikkel
dc.type.peerreviewedPeer reviewed
dc.source.issn1460-9819
dc.identifier.fulltextFulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/93187/1/skribeland.pdf
dc.type.versionPublishedVersion
dc.relation.projectNFR/247622


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
This item's license is: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International