Hide metadata

dc.date.accessioned2022-04-01T17:04:25Z
dc.date.available2022-04-01T17:04:25Z
dc.date.created2021-04-06T13:53:52Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationHofmann, Bjørn Morten . Internal barriers to efficiency: Why disinvestments are so difficult. Identifying and addressing internal barriers to disinvestment of health technologies. Health Economics, Policy and Law. 2021, 16, 473-488
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/93167
dc.description.abstractAbstract Although efficiency is a core concept in health economics, its impact on health care practice still is modest. Despite an increased pressure on resource allocation, a widespread use of low-value care is identified. Nonetheless, disinvestments are rare. Why is this so? This is the key question of this paper: why are disinvestments not more prevalent and improving the efficiency of the health care system, given their sound foundation in health economics, their morally important rationale, the significant evidence for a long list of low-value care and available alternatives? Although several external barriers to disinvestments have been identified, this paper looks inside us for mental mechanisms that hamper rational assessment, implementation, use and disinvestment of health technologies. Critically identifying and assessing internal inclinations, such as cognitive biases, affective biases and imperatives, is the first step toward a more rational handling of health technologies. In order to provide accountable and efficient care we must engage in the quest against the figments of our minds; to disinvest in low-value care in order to provide high-value health care.
dc.languageEN
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.titleInternal barriers to efficiency: Why disinvestments are so difficult. Identifying and addressing internal barriers to disinvestment of health technologies
dc.typeJournal article
dc.creator.authorHofmann, Bjørn Morten
cristin.unitcode185,52,13,0
cristin.unitnameSenter for medisinsk etikk
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.cristin1902411
dc.identifier.bibliographiccitationinfo:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Health Economics, Policy and Law&rft.volume=16&rft.spage=473&rft.date=2021
dc.identifier.jtitleHealth Economics, Policy and Law
dc.identifier.volume16
dc.identifier.issue4
dc.identifier.startpage473
dc.identifier.endpage488
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1017/S1744133121000037
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-95747
dc.type.documentTidsskriftartikkel
dc.type.peerreviewedPeer reviewed
dc.source.issn1744-1331
dc.identifier.fulltextFulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/93167/6/10-1017-S1744133121000037.pdf
dc.type.versionPublishedVersion


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata

Attribution 4.0 International
This item's license is: Attribution 4.0 International