Hide metadata

dc.date.accessioned2022-03-12T17:53:57Z
dc.date.available2022-03-12T17:53:57Z
dc.date.created2021-07-07T09:33:17Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationKleppestø, Magne Bjørnerud, Atle Groote, Inge Rasmus Kim, Minjae Vardal, Jonas Larsson, Christopher . Operator dependency of arterial input function in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine. 2021
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/92370
dc.description.abstractObjective To investigate the effect of inter-operator variability in arterial input function (AIF) definition on kinetic parameter estimates (KPEs) from dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI in patients with high-grade gliomas. Methods The study included 118 DCE series from 23 patients. AIFs were measured by three domain experts (DEs), and a population AIF (pop-AIF) was constructed from the measured AIFs. The DE-AIFs, pop-AIF and AUC-normalized DE-AIFs were used for pharmacokinetic analysis with the extended Tofts model. AIF-dependence of KPEs was assessed by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) analysis, and the impact on relative longitudinal change in Ktrans was assessed by Fleiss’ kappa (κ). Results There was a moderate to substantial agreement (ICC 0.51–0.76) between KPEs when using DE-AIFs, while AUC-normalized AIFs yielded ICC 0.77–0.95 for Ktrans, kep and ve and ICC 0.70 for vp. Inclusion of the pop-AIF did not reduce agreement. Agreement in relative longitudinal change in Ktrans was moderate (κ = 0.591) using DE-AIFs, while AUC-normalized AIFs gave substantial (κ = 0.809) agreement. Discussion AUC-normalized AIFs can reduce the variation in kinetic parameter results originating from operator input. The pop-AIF presented in this work may be applied in absence of a satisfactory measurement.
dc.languageEN
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.titleOperator dependency of arterial input function in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI
dc.typeJournal article
dc.creator.authorKleppestø, Magne
dc.creator.authorBjørnerud, Atle
dc.creator.authorGroote, Inge Rasmus
dc.creator.authorKim, Minjae
dc.creator.authorVardal, Jonas
dc.creator.authorLarsson, Christopher
cristin.unitcode185,53,63,10
cristin.unitnameAvdeling for radiologi-nukleærmedisin
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.cristin1920606
dc.identifier.bibliographiccitationinfo:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine&rft.volume=&rft.spage=&rft.date=2021
dc.identifier.jtitleMagnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine
dc.identifier.volume35
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.startpage105
dc.identifier.endpage112
dc.identifier.pagecount8
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10334-021-00926-z
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-94962
dc.type.documentTidsskriftartikkel
dc.type.peerreviewedPeer reviewed
dc.source.issn0968-5243
dc.identifier.fulltextFulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/92370/1/Kleppest%25C3%25B82021_Article_OperatorDependencyOfArterialIn.pdf
dc.type.versionPublishedVersion


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata

Attribution 4.0 International
This item's license is: Attribution 4.0 International