Hide metadata

dc.date.accessioned2022-03-11T17:59:04Z
dc.date.available2022-03-11T17:59:04Z
dc.date.created2022-01-30T18:47:58Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationLombard, Jordan Bråten, Ivar van de Leemput, Cécile Amadieu, Franck . Performance and acceptance when using tablets as a multiple document learning tool: do application and guidance matter?. Instructional Science. 2021, 49(2), 197-221
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/92319
dc.description.abstractThis study addressed whether an application adapted to working with multiple documents implemented in an iPad Pro tablet would promote students’ multiple document comprehension and acceptance of tablets as a multiple document learning tool relative to controls who used a traditional application adapted to sequential reading of single documents. Results indicated that students using the multiple document reading application outperformed the control students in terms of comprehension and also worked more efficiently on the assigned multiple document task, but only if given explicit guidance in selecting, organizing, and integrating information by utilizing the functions of the application. Still, after task completion, the more effective and efficient students guided in using the functions of the multiple document reading application displayed much less acceptance of tablets as a multiple document learning tool than did the control students. We discuss possible explanations for this intriguing performance-acceptance paradox and suggest some avenues for future research in this area.
dc.languageEN
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.titlePerformance and acceptance when using tablets as a multiple document learning tool: do application and guidance matter?
dc.typeJournal article
dc.creator.authorLombard, Jordan
dc.creator.authorBråten, Ivar
dc.creator.authorvan de Leemput, Cécile
dc.creator.authorAmadieu, Franck
cristin.unitcode185,18,1,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for pedagogikk
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2
dc.identifier.cristin1993808
dc.identifier.bibliographiccitationinfo:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Instructional Science&rft.volume=49&rft.spage=197&rft.date=2021
dc.identifier.jtitleInstructional Science
dc.identifier.volume49
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.identifier.startpage197
dc.identifier.endpage221
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-021-09537-6
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-94898
dc.type.documentTidsskriftartikkel
dc.type.peerreviewedPeer reviewed
dc.source.issn0020-4277
dc.identifier.fulltextFulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/92319/1/Lombard2021_Article_PerformanceAndAcceptanceWhenUs.pdf
dc.type.versionPublishedVersion


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata

Attribution 4.0 International
This item's license is: Attribution 4.0 International