Hide metadata

dc.date.accessioned2022-03-02T18:12:50Z
dc.date.available2022-03-02T18:12:50Z
dc.date.created2021-06-02T17:43:46Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationFawad, Manzar Mondol, Nazmul Haque . Monitoring geological storage of CO2: a new approach. Scientific Reports. 2021, 11(1)
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/91726
dc.description.abstractAbstract Geological CO 2 storage can be employed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to the atmosphere. Depleted oil and gas reservoirs, deep saline aquifers, and coal beds are considered to be viable subsurface CO 2 storage options. Remote monitoring is essential for observing CO 2 plume migration and potential leak detection during and after injection. Leak detection is probably the main risk, though overall monitoring for the plume boundaries and verification of stored volumes are also necessary. There are many effective remote CO 2 monitoring techniques with various benefits and limitations. We suggest a new approach using a combination of repeated seismic and electromagnetic surveys to delineate CO 2 plume and estimate the gas saturation in a saline reservoir during the lifetime of a storage site. This study deals with the CO 2 plume delineation and saturation estimation using a combination of seismic and electromagnetic or controlled-source electromagnetic (EM/CSEM) synthetic data. We assumed two scenarios over a period of 40 years; Case 1 was modeled assuming both seismic and EM repeated surveys were acquired, whereas, in Case 2, repeated EM surveys were taken with only before injection (baseline) 3D seismic data available. Our results show that monitoring the CO 2 plume in terms of extent and saturation is possible both by (i) using a repeated seismic and electromagnetic, and (ii) using a baseline seismic in combination with repeated electromagnetic data. Due to the nature of the seismic and EM techniques, spatial coverage from the reservoir's base to the surface makes it possible to detect the CO 2 plume’s lateral and vertical migration. However, the CSEM low resolution and depth uncertainties are some limitations that need consideration. These results also have implications for monitoring oil production—especially with water flooding, hydrocarbon exploration, and freshwater aquifer identification.
dc.languageEN
dc.publisherNature Portfolio
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.titleMonitoring geological storage of CO2: a new approach
dc.typeJournal article
dc.creator.authorFawad, Manzar
dc.creator.authorMondol, Nazmul Haque
cristin.unitcode185,15,22,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for geofag
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.cristin1913388
dc.identifier.bibliographiccitationinfo:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Scientific Reports&rft.volume=11&rft.spage=&rft.date=2021
dc.identifier.jtitleScientific Reports
dc.identifier.volume11
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.pagecount9
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85346-8
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-94303
dc.type.documentTidsskriftartikkel
dc.type.peerreviewedPeer reviewed
dc.source.issn2045-2322
dc.identifier.fulltextFulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/91726/1/FawadMonitoringGeological.pdf
dc.type.versionPublishedVersion
cristin.articleid5942


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata

Attribution 4.0 International
This item's license is: Attribution 4.0 International