Ground and Grain

dc.date.accessioned	2021-12-10T13:14:08Z
dc.date.available	2021-12-10T13:14:08Z
dc.date.created	2021-11-21T22:32:22Z
dc.date.issued	2021
dc.identifier.citation	Fritz, Peter . Ground and Grain. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 2021
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10852/89498
dc.description.abstract	Current views of metaphysical ground suggest that a true conjunction is immediately grounded in its conjuncts, and only its conjuncts. Similar principles are suggested for disjunction and universal quantification. Here, it is shown that these principles are jointly inconsistent: They require that there is a distinct truth for any plurality of truths. By a variant of Cantor’s Theorem, such a fine-grained individuation of truths is inconsistent. This shows that the notion of grounding is either not in good standing, or that natural assumptions about it need to be revised.
dc.language	EN
dc.rights	Attribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.uri	https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.title	Ground and Grain
dc.type	Journal article
dc.creator.author	Fritz, Peter
cristin.unitcode	185,14,33,20
cristin.unitname	Filosofi
cristin.ispublished	true
cristin.fulltext	original
cristin.qualitycode	2
dc.identifier.cristin	1957013
dc.identifier.bibliographiccitation	info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Philosophy and Phenomenological Research&rft.volume=&rft.spage=&rft.date=2021
dc.identifier.jtitle	Philosophy and Phenomenological Research
dc.identifier.doi	https://doi.org/10.1111/phpr.12822
dc.identifier.urn	URN:NBN:no-92113
dc.type.document	Tidsskriftartikkel
dc.type.peerreviewed	Peer reviewed
dc.source.issn	0031-8205
dc.identifier.fulltext	Fulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/89498/2/online%2Bfirst.pdf
dc.type.version	PublishedVersion