Hide metadata

dc.date.accessioned2021-12-10T12:41:09Z
dc.date.available2021-12-10T12:41:09Z
dc.date.created2021-07-21T12:28:51Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationHøisæter, Åse Arp, Hans Peter Slinde, Gøril Knutsen, Heidi Hale, Sarah Breedveld, Gijs D. Hansen, Mona Cecilie . Excavated vs novel in situ soil washing as a remediation strategy for sandy soils impacted with per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances from aqueous film forming foams. Science of the Total Environment. 2021, 794, 1-9
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/89467
dc.description.abstractIn situ soil washing at the field scale has not yet been investigated as a remediation strategy for soils impacted by per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). This remediation strategy is a promising low-cost alternative to other costlier remediation options like excavating, transporting and landfilling large amounts of PFAS contaminated soil. However, it is unclear if it is effective at the field scale, where large areas of heterogenous soil can be challenging to saturate with infiltration water and then pump to a treatment facility. To address this for the first time, herein we established three different trials involving in situ washing of an undisturbed, 3 m deep, sandy vadose zone soil contaminated with aqueous film forming foam (AFFF). The trials were performed at a site with an established pump and treat system for treating PFAS contaminated groundwater. In situ soil washing was compared to the more conventional practice of washing excavated soil on top of an impermeable bottom lining where the PFAS contaminated water was collected and monitored in a drainage system before treatment. The measured amount of perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) removed was compared with expectations based on a non-calibrated, 1-D first order rate saturated soil model using only the local soil-to-water distribution coefficient as well as the volume and irrigation rate of wash water as input. This model predicted results within a factor of 2. The suspected reasons for small discrepancies between model predictions and excavated vs in situ washing was a combination of the heterogeneity of PFOS distribution in the soil as well as preferential flow paths during soil washing that prevented full saturation. This analysis showed that in situ soil washing was more efficient and less costly than washing excavated sandy soil, particularly if a pump-and-treat system is already in place.
dc.languageEN
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.titleExcavated vs novel in situ soil washing as a remediation strategy for sandy soils impacted with per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances from aqueous film forming foams
dc.typeJournal article
dc.creator.authorHøisæter, Åse
dc.creator.authorArp, Hans Peter
dc.creator.authorSlinde, Gøril
dc.creator.authorKnutsen, Heidi
dc.creator.authorHale, Sarah
dc.creator.authorBreedveld, Gijs D.
dc.creator.authorHansen, Mona Cecilie
cristin.unitcode185,15,22,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for geofag
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2
dc.identifier.cristin1922328
dc.identifier.bibliographiccitationinfo:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Science of the Total Environment&rft.volume=794&rft.spage=1&rft.date=2021
dc.identifier.jtitleScience of the Total Environment
dc.identifier.volume794
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148763
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-92097
dc.type.documentTidsskriftartikkel
dc.type.peerreviewedPeer reviewed
dc.source.issn0048-9697
dc.identifier.fulltextFulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/89467/2/H%25C3%25B8is%25C3%25A6ter_etal%25282021%2529.pdf
dc.type.versionPublishedVersion
cristin.articleid148763
dc.relation.projectNFR/302371


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata

Attribution 4.0 International
This item's license is: Attribution 4.0 International