Hide metadata

dc.date.accessioned2021-10-04T09:21:23Z
dc.date.available2021-10-04T09:21:23Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/88722
dc.description.abstractOne in eleven women in Norway will be diagnosed with breast cancer by age 75. Organized mammographic screening can detect early stage breast cancer and reduce deaths from this disease. However, screening involves harms, such as the potential detection of a slow growing breast cancer that would never present symptomatically during a woman’s lifetime (overdiagnosis). “Underdiagnosis” can also occur, which was defined as “failing” to diagnose a breast cancer that would present symptomatically during a woman’s lifetime. This thesis aimed to generate knowledge about these harms through three studies. The first study demonstrated that radiologists and pathologists preferentially round tumour diameter measurements, which can lead to understaging but not overstaging. The second study considered whether women with “missed” cancers that were diagnosed at a subsequent screening examination could be underdiagnosed. Based on their tumour characteristics and survival profile, it was posited that these women received a timely diagnosis. The last study indicated that women have relatively less knowledge about overdiagnosis than other topics related to mammographic screening. This study highlights some of the challenges related to communicating information about overdiagnosis and screening.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.haspartPaper 1: Tsuruda KM, Hofvind S, Akslen LA, Hoff SR, Veierød MB. Terminal digit preference: a source of measurement error in breast cancer diameter reporting. Acta Oncol. 2020;59(3):260-7. DOI: 10.1080/0284186X.2019.1669817. The article is included in the thesis. Also available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186X.2019.1669817
dc.relation.haspartPaper 2: Tsuruda KM, Hovda T, Bhargava S, Veierød MB, Hofvind S. Survival among women diagnosed with screen-detected or interval breast cancer classified as true, minimal signs, or missed through an informed radiological review. Eur Radiol. 12 November 2020. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-020-07340-4. Online ahead of print. The article is included in the thesis. Also available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07340-4
dc.relation.haspartPaper 3: Tsuruda KM, Veierød MB, Houssami M, Waade GG, Mangerud G, Hofvind S. Women’s conceptual knowledge about breast cancer screening and overdiagnosis in Norway: a crosssectional study. Published in: BMJ Open 2021;11:e052121. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052121. The paper is included in the thesis. The published version is available at: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052121
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/0284186X.2019.1669817
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07340-4
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052121
dc.titleOverdiagnosis and “underdiagnosis” in BreastScreen Norwayen_US
dc.typeDoctoral thesisen_US
dc.creator.authorTsuruda, Kaitlyn M.
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-91337
dc.type.documentDoktoravhandlingen_US
dc.identifier.fulltextFulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/88722/3/PhD-Tsuruda-2021.pdf


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata