Hide metadata

dc.date.accessioned2021-07-05T15:25:39Z
dc.date.available2021-07-05T15:25:39Z
dc.date.created2021-06-04T11:44:29Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationUnsgaard-Tøndel, Monica Vasseljen, Ottar Nilsen, Tom Ivar Lund Myhre, Gard Robinson, Hilde Stendal Meisingset, Ingebrigt . Prognostic ability of STarT Back Screening Tool combined with work-related factors in patients with low back pain in primary care: a prospective study. BMJ Open. 2021
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/86530
dc.description.abstractObjective Primary care screening tools for patients with low back pain may improve outcome by identifying modifiable obstacles for recovery. The STarT Back Screening Tool (SBST) consists of nine biological and psychological items, with less focus on work-related factors. We aimed at testing the prognostic ability of SBST and the effect of adding items for future and present work ability. Methods Prospective observational study in patients (n=158) attending primary care physical therapy for low back pain. The prognostic ability of SBST and the added prognostic value of two work items; expectation for future work ability and current work ability, were calculated for disability, pain and quality of life outcome at 3 months follow-up. The medium and high-risk group in the SBST were collapsed in the analyses due to few patients in the high-risk group. The prognostic ability was assessed using the explained variance (R2) of the outcomes from univariable and multivariable linear regression and beta values with 95% CIs were used to assess the prognostic value of individual items. Results The SBST classified 107 (67.7%) patients as low risk and 51 (32.3%) patients as medium/high risk. SBST provided prognostic ability for disability (R2=0.35), pain (R2=0.25) and quality of life (R2=0.28). Expectation for return to work predicted outcome in univariable analyses but provided limited additional prognostic ability when added to the SBST. Present work ability provided additional prognostic ability for disability (β=−2.5; 95% CI=−3.6 to −1.4), pain (β=−0.2; 95% CI=−0.5 to −0.002) and quality of life (β=0.02; 95% CI=0.001 to 0.04) in the multivariable analyses. The explained variance (R2) when work ability was added to the SBST was 0.60, 0.49 and 0.47 for disability, pain and quality of life, respectively. Conclusions Adding one work ability item to the SBST gives additional prognostic information across core outcomes.
dc.languageEN
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Group
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.titlePrognostic ability of STarT Back Screening Tool combined with work-related factors in patients with low back pain in primary care: a prospective study
dc.typeJournal article
dc.creator.authorUnsgaard-Tøndel, Monica
dc.creator.authorVasseljen, Ottar
dc.creator.authorNilsen, Tom Ivar Lund
dc.creator.authorMyhre, Gard
dc.creator.authorRobinson, Hilde Stendal
dc.creator.authorMeisingset, Ingebrigt
cristin.unitcode185,52,10,0
cristin.unitnameAvdeling for tverrfaglig helsevitenskap
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.cristin1913747
dc.identifier.bibliographiccitationinfo:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=BMJ Open&rft.volume=&rft.spage=&rft.date=2021
dc.identifier.jtitleBMJ Open
dc.identifier.volume11
dc.identifier.issue6
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046446
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-89163
dc.type.documentTidsskriftartikkel
dc.type.peerreviewedPeer reviewed
dc.source.issn2044-6055
dc.identifier.fulltextFulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/86530/2/Unsgaard-T%25C3%25B8ndel.pdf
dc.type.versionPublishedVersion
cristin.articleide046446


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata

Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
This item's license is: Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International