Hide metadata

dc.date.accessioned2021-06-16T15:10:02Z
dc.date.available2021-06-16T15:10:02Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/86388
dc.description.abstractWhich types of policies are important in advancing sustainability transitions? Why and how do the preferences of some actors change? This thesis investigates the role of politics, policies and electricity market design(s) in the unfolding European energy transition in the period 2013-2018. Through systemic assessments of existing policies, market configurations and the policy preferences of key actors, it analyzes how the relationship between policies and markets change during a transition. In four individual papers, the thesis shows that advancing transitions embody competing pathways. The European energy transition is characterized by the tension between increasing decentralization of the energy system versus (continued) centralization of production, infrastructure, and system operation. In the current phase of the transition, there is more disagreement about the direction of the transition, than whether it should take place at all. Finally, the thesis provides new insights about the role of electricity market design. A key finding is that market design can simplify the integration of renewable energy by increasing flexibility and bringing system costs down.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.haspartPaper 1. Marie Byskov Lindberg, Jochen Markard, Allan Dahl Andersen. 2019. Policies, actors and sustainability transition pathways: A study of the EU’s energy policy mix. Research Policy. Vol. 48 (10). The paper is not included in the thesis, the published version is available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.09.003
dc.relation.haspartPaper 2. Marie Byskov Lindberg. 2019. The EU Emissions Trading System and Renewable Energy Policies: Friends or Foes in the European Policy Mix? Politics and Governance, Vol.7(1), pp.105- 123 The paper is not included in the thesis, the published version is available at: https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v7i1.1800
dc.relation.haspartPaper 3. Marie Byskov Lindberg, Lorenz Kammermann. The rise of the nigime? An assessment of advocacy coalitions in an advancing energy transition. Published as: Advocacy coalitions in the acceleration phase of the European energy transition. In: Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 40 (2021), 262-282. DOI: 10.1016/j.eist.2021.07.006. The paper is not included in the thesis. The published version is available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2021.07.006
dc.relation.haspartPaper 4. Marie Byskov Lindberg. The power of power markets: How do zonal market designs comply with advancing energy transitions? Published as: The power of power markets: Zonal market designs in advancing energy transitions. In: Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 40 (2021), 262-282. DOI: 10.1016/j.eist.2021.07.006. The paper is not included in the thesis. The published version is available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2022.08.004
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.09.003
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v7i1.1800
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2021.07.006
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2022.08.004
dc.titleCurrents of Change - Actors, policies and market design in an advancing energy transitionen_US
dc.typeDoctoral thesisen_US
dc.creator.authorLindberg, Marie Byskov
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-89034
dc.type.documentDoktoravhandlingen_US
dc.identifier.fulltextFulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/86388/1/doctoralthesis-lindberg.pdf


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata