Hide metadata

dc.date.accessioned2021-06-07T15:21:53Z
dc.date.available2021-06-07T15:21:53Z
dc.date.created2020-09-17T11:30:22Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationAsdal, Kristin Hobæk, Bård . The modified issue: Turning around parliaments, politics as usual and how to extend issue-politics with a little help from Max Weber. Social Studies of Science. 2020, 50(2), 252-270
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/86325
dc.description.abstractOrdinary political institutions such as parliaments remain under-explored in Science and Technology Studies (STS) and the conceptual resources for studying politics are far less developed than for science. But sites like parliaments are far more interesting than are their received images. This article argues that novel re-combinations of the issue-literature in STS and the works on parliament and objectivity by the German scholar Max Weber can provide us with analytical resources for grasping parliamentary politics with new lenses. In fact, reading Weber in light of the issue-literature provides for a better understanding of his work, and points towards how Weber’s accounts are crucially about parliamentary politics as work – on and with issues and the matters at hand. In addition, Weber may improve STS’s accounts of politics by his way of including the ordered and procedural side to issue-politics: Issue-politics is both about ‘opening up’ an issue as well as coming to decisions and take action. The article underlines this by discussing an often-misread part of Weber’s work, namely his work on objectivity and points to how political procedure was a key inspiration to his understanding and developing of this notion.
dc.languageEN
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.titleThe modified issue: Turning around parliaments, politics as usual and how to extend issue-politics with a little help from Max Weber
dc.typeJournal article
dc.creator.authorAsdal, Kristin
dc.creator.authorHobæk, Bård
cristin.unitcode185,17,1,0
cristin.unitnameSenter for teknologi, innovasjon og kultur
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2
dc.identifier.cristin1830768
dc.identifier.bibliographiccitationinfo:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Social Studies of Science&rft.volume=50&rft.spage=252&rft.date=2020
dc.identifier.jtitleSocial Studies of Science
dc.identifier.volume50
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.identifier.startpage252
dc.identifier.endpage270
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1177/0306312720902847
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-88973
dc.type.documentTidsskriftartikkel
dc.type.peerreviewedPeer reviewed
dc.source.issn0306-3127
dc.identifier.fulltextFulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/86325/2/2020_Asdal_Hob%25C3%25A6k_SSS.pdf
dc.type.versionPublishedVersion


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata

Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
This item's license is: Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International