Hide metadata

dc.date.accessioned2021-04-27T11:22:49Z
dc.date.available2021-04-27T11:22:49Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/85661
dc.description.abstractThis thesis comprises three articles and is situated in the field of cross-national observation research on instructional quality in mathematics education. It investigates patterns of instructional quality in lower secondary mathematics classrooms in Finnish-Swedish and Norwegian contexts (Helsinki and Oslo areas). The overarching research question is: How can patterns of instructional quality be understood through observation systems and teachers’ perspectives? This phenomenon is investigated from three different perspectives; as observed by a standardized observation system (Article Ⅰ); from two Finnish mathematics teachers’ perspectives on their own discourse practices (Article Ⅱ); and from a critical perspective of possible biases in observation systems when applied in and across different classroom contexts (Article Ⅲ). The findings together contribute with knowledge of typical features of mathematics instruction in Helsinki and Oslo contexts as well as how patterns of instructional quality may be understood from the perspectives of teachers and observation systems.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.haspartArticle Ⅰ: Luoto, J. M., Klette, K., & Blikstad-Balas, M. (in review). Patterns of instructional quality in Finnish and Norwegian lower secondary mathematics classrooms. In review at International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. To be published. The paper is not available in DUO awaiting publishing.
dc.relation.haspartArticle Ⅱ: Luoto, J. M. (2020). Scrutinizing two Finnish teachers’ instructional rationales and perceived tensions in enacting student participation in mathematical discourse. LUMAT: International Journal on Math, Science and Technology Education, 8(1), 133–161. doi:10.31129/LUMAT.8.1.1329. The paper is included in the thesis. Also available at: https://doi.org/10.31129/LUMAT.8.1.1329
dc.relation.haspartArticle Ⅲ: Luoto, J. M., Klette, K., & Blikstad-Balas. (in review). Possible biases in observation systems when applied across contexts: Conceptualizing, operationalizing and sequencing instructional quality. In review at Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability. To be published. The paper is not available in DUO awaiting publishing.
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.31129/LUMAT.8.1.1329
dc.titleExploring, understanding, and problematizing patterns of instructional quality: A study of instructional quality in Finnish-Swedish and Norwegian lower secondary mathematics classroomsen_US
dc.typeDoctoral thesisen_US
dc.creator.authorLuoto, Jennifer Maria
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-88324
dc.type.documentDoktoravhandlingen_US
dc.identifier.fulltextFulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/85661/1/PhD-Luoto-2021.pdf


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata