Hide metadata

dc.date.accessioned2021-03-24T21:04:35Z
dc.date.available2021-03-24T21:04:35Z
dc.date.created2021-02-02T10:08:59Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationChristensen, Lene Vøllestad, Nina Køpke Veierød, Marit Bragelien Jakobsen, Vidar Eivind Stuge, Britt Bakke, Eva Cabri, Jan Maria Hendrick Robinson, Hilde Stendal . Trunk, pelvic and hip kinematics during the Stork test in pregnant women with pelvic girdle pain, asymptomatic pregnant and non-pregnant women. Clinical Biomechanics. 2020, 80:105168, 1-8
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/84737
dc.description.abstractBackground Pelvic girdle pain is prevalent during pregnancy, and women affected report weight-bearing activities to be their main disability. The Stork test is a commonly used single-leg-stance test. As clinicians report specific movement patterns in those with pelvic girdle pain, we aimed to investigate the influence of both pregnancy and pelvic girdle pain on performance of the Stork test. Methods In this cross-sectional study, 25 pregnant women with pelvic girdle pain, 23 asymptomatic pregnant and 24 asymptomatic non-pregnant women underwent three-dimensional kinematic analysis of the Stork test. Linear mixed models were used to investigate between-group differences in trunk, pelvic and hip kinematics during neutral stance, weight shift, leg lift and single leg stance. Findings Few and small significant between-group differences were found. Pregnant women with pelvic girdle pain had significantly less hip adduction during single leg stance compared to asymptomatic pregnant women (estimated marginal means (95% confidence intervals) -1.1° (−2.4°, 0.3°) and 1.0° (−0.4°, 2.4°), respectively; P = 0.03). Asymptomatic pregnant women had significantly less hip internal rotation compared to non-pregnant women 4.1° (1.6°, 6.7°) and 7.9° (5.4°, 10.4°), respectively (P = 0.04) and greater peak hip flexion angle of the lifted leg in single leg stance 80.4° (77.0°, 83.9°) and 74.1° (70.8°, 77.5°), respectively (P = 0.01). Variation in key kinematic variables was large across participants in all three groups. Interpretation Our findings indicate that trunk, pelvic and hip movements during the Stork test are not specific to pregnancy and/or pelvic girdle pain in the 2nd trimester. Instead, movement strategies appear unique to each individual.
dc.languageEN
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.titleTrunk, pelvic and hip kinematics during the Stork test in pregnant women with pelvic girdle pain, asymptomatic pregnant and non-pregnant women
dc.typeJournal article
dc.creator.authorChristensen, Lene
dc.creator.authorVøllestad, Nina Køpke
dc.creator.authorVeierød, Marit Bragelien
dc.creator.authorJakobsen, Vidar Eivind
dc.creator.authorStuge, Britt
dc.creator.authorBakke, Eva
dc.creator.authorCabri, Jan Maria Hendrick
dc.creator.authorRobinson, Hilde Stendal
cristin.unitcode185,52,10,0
cristin.unitnameAvdeling for tverrfaglig helsevitenskap
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.cristin1885719
dc.identifier.bibliographiccitationinfo:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Clinical Biomechanics&rft.volume=80:105168&rft.spage=1&rft.date=2020
dc.identifier.jtitleClinical Biomechanics
dc.identifier.volume80
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2020.105168
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-87442
dc.type.documentTidsskriftartikkel
dc.type.peerreviewedPeer reviewed
dc.source.issn0268-0033
dc.identifier.fulltextFulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/84737/1/Christensen_2020_Stork.pdf
dc.type.versionPublishedVersion
cristin.articleid105168


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata

Attribution 4.0 International
This item's license is: Attribution 4.0 International