Skjul metadata

dc.date.accessioned2021-03-14T20:30:16Z
dc.date.available2021-03-14T20:30:16Z
dc.date.created2021-01-28T15:04:45Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationHofmann, Bjørn . The first casualty of an epidemic is evidence. Journal of Evaluation In Clinical Practice. 2020, 26, 1344-1346
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/84023
dc.description.abstractBackground The COVID‐19 has posed a wide range of urgent questions: about the disease, testing, immunity, treatments, and outcomes. Extreme situations, such as pandemics, call for exceptional measures. However, this threatens the production and application of evidence. Methods This article applies standard categories in epistemology to analyse the pandemic in terms of four kinds of uncertainty: Risk, Fundamental uncertainty, Ignorance, and Ambiguity. Results Mapping the uncertainties of the pandemic onto the four types of uncertainty directs evidence production towards specific tasks in order to address the challenges of the pandemic: Eliminating ambiguity, being alert to the unknown, and gathering data to estimate risks are crucial to preserve evidence and save lives. Conclusion In order to avoid fake facts and to provide sustainable solutions, we need to pay attention to the various kinds of uncertainty. Producing high‐quality evidence is the solution, not the problem.
dc.languageEN
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.titleThe first casualty of an epidemic is evidence
dc.typeJournal article
dc.creator.authorHofmann, Bjørn
cristin.unitcode185,52,13,0
cristin.unitnameSenter for medisinsk etikk
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.cristin1881404
dc.identifier.bibliographiccitationinfo:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Journal of Evaluation In Clinical Practice&rft.volume=26&rft.spage=1344&rft.date=2020
dc.identifier.jtitleJournal of Evaluation In Clinical Practice
dc.identifier.volume26
dc.identifier.issue5
dc.identifier.startpage1344
dc.identifier.endpage1346
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1111/jep.13443
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-86754
dc.type.documentTidsskriftartikkel
dc.type.peerreviewedPeer reviewed
dc.source.issn1356-1294
dc.identifier.fulltextFulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/84023/5/jep.13443.pdf
dc.type.versionPublishedVersion


Tilhørende fil(er)

Finnes i følgende samling

Skjul metadata

Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
Dette verket har følgende lisens: Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International